Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
less economical
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "less economical" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when comparing the cost-effectiveness or efficiency of two or more options, indicating that one option is not as economical as another. Example: "While the new model has advanced features, it is less economical than the previous version in terms of fuel consumption."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Encyclopedias
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
48 human-written examples
Even less economical was sheep intestine.
News & Media
But Mr. Pepelyaev is less economical onstage.
News & Media
One is less economical and the other is less sustainable.
News & Media
It had been replacing malbec, which is less economical to grow.
News & Media
It was fast, but too repetitive, and less economical than had been hoped.
News & Media
His pictures became less daring in conception and less economical in means.
Encyclopedias
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
11 human-written examples
"Economical runners perform better than less-economical runners.
News & Media
With the planet's population heading ever more rapidly towards the seven billion mark (we'll get there in October) and an ever-less-economical reliance on meat, farmed insects might just provide an answer.
News & Media
This finding would not necessarily rule out the energy hypothesis for the origins of bipedalism [34], but would suggest that early bipeds were less energetically economical than modern humans.
Science
Based on a given case in a Dutch hospital, we mainly focus on personal preferences and less on economical preferences, because patient and personnel satisfaction is highly important in the Netherlands due to shortage of personnel and competition between hospitals.
As a director – in charge of the general design and concept – Khitruk developed a freer, less lush, more economical and more contemporary art style than the naturalistic graphic look and sentimentality of Disney.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When comparing options, clearly state what specific aspect is "less economical", such as fuel consumption, maintenance costs, or overall investment.
Common error
Avoid stating that something is "less economical" without specifying the context. Provide details about the specific area where costs are higher, such as "less economical in the long run due to higher repair expenses".
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "less economical" functions as a comparative adjective phrase. It describes something that is not as efficient or cost-effective as another option. As Ludwig AI points out, it is grammatically correct and usable in English.
Frequent in
News & Media
37%
Science
35%
Encyclopedias
8%
Less common in
Wiki
4%
Formal & Business
4%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "less economical" is a grammatically sound and relatively common way to express that something is not as cost-effective or efficient as something else. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage. It is most frequently found in news, scientific, and encyclopedia sources, and has a neutral to formal register. When using the phrase, it's important to specify what aspect is "less economical" to provide a clear understanding of the comparison. Alternatives include ""less cost effective"", "more expensive", and "less efficient", depending on the context.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
less cost-effective
Focuses specifically on the relationship between cost and effectiveness.
less efficient
Highlights the reduced efficiency in terms of resource utilization.
less budget-friendly
Emphasizes the impact on budget limitations.
more expensive
Directly refers to a higher price or cost.
less advantageous financially
Indicates that an option is not as beneficial from a financial standpoint.
more wasteful
Indicates a higher level of resource consumption or expenditure.
less thrifty
Emphasizes the lack of careful management of resources.
more high-priced
Focuses on the fact of being more expensive than another thing.
more extravagant
Suggests a lavish or luxurious approach, implying higher costs.
less profitable
Highlights the reduced profitability of a business decision.
FAQs
What does "less economical" mean?
The phrase "less economical" indicates that something is not as efficient or cost-effective as another option. It suggests a higher expense or a poorer use of resources.
How can I use "less economical" in a sentence?
You can use "less economical" to compare two options, such as: "While the hybrid car is environmentally friendly, it can be "less cost effective" due to its higher initial price."
What's the difference between "less economical" and "less expensive"?
"Less expensive" simply means costing less money. "Less economical", however, implies a broader consideration of costs, including factors like efficiency, maintenance, and long-term value, not just the initial price.
What are some alternatives to saying "less economical"?
Alternatives include ""less cost effective"", "less efficient", "more expensive", or "more wasteful", depending on the specific aspect you want to emphasize.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested