The average hop count in PSODTN is 55.56% fewer than that in ER and 37.85% less than that in PROPHET.Message delivery delay is illustrated in Figure 11.
The average hop count in PSODTN is 13% fewer than that in PROPHET and 27% less than that in ER.Message delivery delay is shown in Figure 15.
On the other hand, Colchicine must diffuse through the follicle cell layer and throughout the large oocyte before it can affect MT dynamics, thereby leaving open the possibility that the MTs may disappear in less than 5-10 mifuthisif this delivery delay had been absent.
As shown in Figure 9, although the enhancement brings longer packet delivery delay, the maximum delay introduced ( milliseconds) is still much less than the required message lifetime 500 milliseconds.
Finally, SIDD delivers 3%, 2 %, 2, and 1% less, respectively, when compandd with the SIMHD scheme.In terms of bundle average delivery delay, the performance of GeoSpray presents significant gains when compared to Spray and Wait.
Toward the 2-hop forwarding, the scheme generates the less duplicate copy and reduce the network overhead, however, the 2-hop forwarding has the higher delivery delay and lower successful delivery rate.
Finally, SIDD delivers 1%, 1%, 1%, and 1% less of the bundles, when compared with the SIMHD scheme.In terms of bundle average delivery delay, the performance of GeoSpray presents significant gains when compared to Spray and Wait.
The RC combination gives preferential treatment to bundles that have been less replicated, balancing the number of copies of each bundle in the network and improving the bundle delivery delay.
