less cost effectiveness

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "less cost effectiveness" is not correct in standard English; it should be "less cost-effective." You can use it when discussing the reduced efficiency or value of a solution or option in terms of cost.
Example: "The new software solution has less cost effectiveness compared to the previous version, leading to higher expenses for the company."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

Provisions of RV1 vaccine alone or diarrhoea management alone are both less cost effectiveness alternatives.

Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation

An extension of current endoscopic screening to include patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease would have even less cost effectiveness, even though this group is at increased risk of developing oesophageal cancer (Iftikhar et al, 1992).

British Journal of Cancer

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

Compared to smoking – a comparatively "old" challenge – it is not surprising that thus far significantly less (cost- effectiveness evidencost- effectivenessatevidencerms of thasprevention of dietary intake and obeenty.

Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation

This has implications of less cost-effectiveness, time-consuming, and bias in the selection of households towards the middle of the village and probably those with similar socio-economic status.

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

When this latter proportion is about 20.3%, the prophylaxis strategy is a less cost effective strategy (the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of prophylaxis vs. screening is around 1500 $/LYG).

Plosone

Based on the data used in the model, cementless prostheses appear to be less costly than cemented ones over 5 years, but not less cost-effective when an incremental cost effectiveness ratio of less than €50,0000 per QALY was adopted.

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Undoubtedly, imaging modalities allow earlier and accurate diagnosis; however, serum biomarkers have their own advantages over imaging, that is, cost effectiveness, less cumbersome, and less time to analyze the reports.

BioMed Research International

If one intervention were more effective and less expensive, an incremental cost effectiveness (utility) ratio (ICER) would not need to be calculated as it would be clear that the more effective intervention is preferred.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Strategies were considered cost effective if they generated an incremental cost effectiveness ratio less than the usual National Health Service maximum willingness to pay of £30 000 (€34 000; $48 000) per QALY.

British Medical Journal

Results Addition of a proton pump inhibitor to both COX 2 selective inhibitors and traditional NSAIDs was highly cost effective for all patient groups considered (incremental cost effectiveness ratio less than £1000 €11755, $1650)).

British Medical Journal

In the UK, an incremental cost effectiveness ratio of less than £20 000–30 000 is considered cost effective by policy makers.

British Medical Journal

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing the relationship between cost and outcome, use the adjective "cost-effective" followed by "less" or an adverb like "less effectively" or "less efficiently".

Common error

Avoid using "less" directly before the noun "cost-effectiveness". It's more accurate to say something is "less cost-effective" or has "lower cost-effectiveness".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "less cost effectiveness" functions as a noun phrase intended to describe a situation where the balance between cost and benefit is reduced. However, as Ludwig AI points out, the phrase is grammatically incorrect, suggesting a need for revision in formal writing.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

33%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while "less cost effectiveness" aims to describe a reduction in the balance between cost and benefit, it's grammatically incorrect. As Ludwig AI points out, using "less cost effective" or "lower cost-effectiveness" is the accurate way to express this concept. Most examples are found in science, news, and business contexts, but its incorrect usage limits its appropriateness in formal writing. Remember to use the adjective form "cost-effective" correctly to maintain clarity and professionalism in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

reduced cost-effectiveness

Uses the adjective "reduced" to describe the state of cost-effectiveness.

less favorable cost-effectiveness

Indicates a comparison where the cost-effectiveness is not as good as another option.

decreased cost-effectiveness

Similar to "reduced", but implies a quantitative decrease.

diminished cost-effectiveness

Emphasizes a gradual decline in cost-effectiveness.

lower cost efficiency

Replaces "effectiveness" with "efficiency", focusing on the ratio of cost to output.

poorer value for money

Shifts the focus to the value received in relation to the money spent.

suboptimal cost-benefit ratio

Highlights that the balance between costs and benefits is not ideal.

less economically efficient

Focuses on economic efficiency rather than direct cost-effectiveness.

lower return on investment

Focuses on the financial return relative to the investment made.

less bang for your buck

An informal way to express reduced value for the cost.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say "less cost effectiveness"?

The grammatically correct way is to say "less cost effective" or "lower cost-effectiveness."

How can I improve the cost effectiveness of a project?

Focus on strategies such as streamlining processes, negotiating better rates with suppliers, and eliminating unnecessary expenses to achieve better "cost savings".

What does it mean if a strategy is described as "less cost effective"?

It means that the strategy provides a lower return in benefits compared to its costs, especially when compared to other alternative strategies. Therefore it implies a "lower value".

What are some alternatives to "less cost effectiveness" in a business context?

In a professional setting, you can use terms like "lower cost efficiency", "reduced cost-effectiveness", or "suboptimal cost-benefit ratio" to convey the same meaning.