Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
less competition for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "less competition for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing situations where there are fewer rivals or contenders for a particular opportunity, resource, or market. Example: "In this niche market, there is less competition for new entrants, making it easier to establish a foothold."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
There is less competition for upgrades from secondary airports".
News & Media
Less music companies probably means fewer record releases; less competition for talent and less creativity.
News & Media
It should also be easier to get decent accommodation with less competition for places".
News & Media
He said he was pleased to find less competition for top job candidates right now.
News & Media
And the weak economy means that there's less competition for labor and resources.
News & Media
The question will be whether they face more, or less, competition for places.
News & Media
They also face less competition for returns than they did a few years ago.
News & Media
A smaller industry means there is less competition for profitable opportunities.
News & Media
That means there's less competition for discovering and developing new therapies.
News & Media
Less competition for everyone else to worry about as France holds back the EU as a whole".
News & Media
Also, Mexico's population is aging, meaning there is less competition for young people looking for work there.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "less competition for", ensure the noun following "for" is specific and clearly defined. This helps avoid ambiguity and ensures the sentence conveys the intended meaning effectively.
Common error
Avoid using "less" when "fewer" is more appropriate. "Less" should be used with uncountable nouns, while "fewer" is for countable nouns. For example, use "fewer competitors for" rather than "less competitors for".
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "less competition for" primarily functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a noun or clause. It indicates a situation where the degree of rivalry or the number of competitors is reduced. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically sound and usable.
Frequent in
News & Media
49%
Science
30%
Formal & Business
8%
Less common in
Wiki
7%
Academia
5%
Encyclopedias
1%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "less competition for" is a grammatically correct and frequently used phrase to indicate a reduction in rivalry or the number of competitors for a particular resource or opportunity. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is valid and usable. It's common in news, media, and scientific contexts. Remember to use "fewer" instead of "less" when referring to countable nouns. Use it when you want to express that something is easier to obtain or achieve due to a reduced number of rivals. Phrases like "reduced rivalry for" or "fewer competitors for" can be used as alternatives.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
reduced rivalry for
Focuses on the diminished level of competition, emphasizing the state of reduced contention.
decreased competition for
Highlights the act of competition lessening, suggesting a change in competitive intensity.
lower competition for
Similar to 'less competition', this implies a reduced degree of competitive pressure.
fewer competitors for
This alternative emphasizes the number of rivals being smaller, shifting the focus from the abstract concept of competition to the concrete number of competitors.
easier access to
Shifts the focus to the outcome of reduced competition, which is easier access to resources or opportunities.
increased opportunity for
Presents the situation from the perspective of improved possibilities due to the absence of intense rivalry.
reduced barriers to entry
Specific to market contexts, this refers to the lowered obstacles for new participants.
more room for
Suggests expanded capacity because competitive participants are lessened.
less crowded field for
Emphasizes the environment having a decreased participant number.
uncontested access to
Presents a scenario of exclusive availability given there is no rivalry.
FAQs
How can I use "less competition for" in a sentence?
You can use "less competition for" to describe situations where there are fewer rivals vying for the same resources or opportunities. For instance, "There is less competition for funding in this niche research area."
What's a good alternative to "less competition for"?
Consider using phrases like "reduced rivalry for", "decreased competition for", or "fewer competitors for" depending on the specific context.
Is it grammatically correct to say "less competition for"?
Yes, "less competition for" is grammatically correct. "Less" is appropriate when referring to the abstract concept of competition, which is uncountable.
What does "less competition for" imply in a business context?
In business, "less competition for" typically suggests a market or industry with "reduced barriers to entry", making it easier for new businesses to succeed or for existing ones to capture a larger market share.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested