less boundaries

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "less boundaries" is not correct in standard English; the correct expression is "fewer boundaries." You can use it when discussing a reduction in limitations or restrictions in various contexts, such as personal growth or creative expression.
Example: "In order to foster creativity, we need to create an environment with fewer boundaries."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

While before they were clear, now they are becoming less boundaries and more cross-sectoral cooperation, which requires that the boundaries become more permeable.

The Journal of Chinese Sociology

I still love classical music, but I got into jazz because I felt like there was less boundaries.

Vice

"What we're seeing is that people are working longer hours, and there's less boundaries between work and personal life because of technology.

Huffington Post

Working with fewer professionals creates less boundaries for information sharing and decision making, which may have resulted in higher levels of integrated care delivery.

BMC Geriatrics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

Combine that with the seemingly unstoppable legislative reinforcement of equal rights, too – gay marriage becoming legal in Ireland, in the US – and suddenly, it seems less "abnormal", less boundary-busting, to fall in love or lust with someone of the same gender.

The Guardian

Then we display the implementation of this method, while the computational boundary is complex and less boundary points need to be handled.

Advances in Difference Equations

Their vibrantly tactile surfaces register less as boundaries of their bodies than as boundaries of the world beyond.

The New Yorker

But remember that even in 1995, in a byelection held on different (and to Labour less favourable) boundaries, the Lib Dems only beat Labour by a majority of 1,993 votes, on 38.5% of the vote.

The Guardian - Opinion

The weak objects are the objects with less clear boundaries.

Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences

Weak objects have less clear boundaries, the extraction of weak object is not easy work.

Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences

In general the loaded FSUs displayed smaller nucleus with less distinct boundaries compared to the controls.

Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When referring to countable items like "boundaries", use "fewer" instead of "less". For instance, say "fewer boundaries" for grammatical correctness.

Common error

Avoid using "less" with countable nouns such as "boundaries", "restrictions", or "limitations". The correct term to use is "fewer" to ensure grammatical accuracy.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "less boundaries" functions as a quantifier plus a noun. However, it exhibits incorrect grammatical usage, as 'less' is typically used with uncountable nouns. Ludwig AI identifies that using "less" with countable nouns like "boundaries" is not standard English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

25%

Formal & Business

25%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "less boundaries" is grammatically incorrect because "boundaries" is a countable noun and should be paired with "fewer". Ludwig AI highlights that the correct phrase is "fewer boundaries". Although the phrase appears in various contexts such as science and news, it's crucial to use correct grammar, especially in formal settings. To convey similar meanings, consider using alternatives like "reduced limitations" or "decreased restrictions". Always remember to use "fewer" with countable nouns to maintain grammatical accuracy.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

fewer boundaries

Replaces "less" with "fewer" to correct the grammatical error, making it appropriate for countable nouns.

reduced limitations

Uses "reduced" to describe the decrease in limitations, offering a grammatically sound alternative.

decreased restrictions

Substitutes "boundaries" with "restrictions" while maintaining the sense of reduction.

fewer constraints

Corrects the grammatical issue by using 'fewer' with the countable noun 'constraints'.

relaxed constraints

Emphasizes the easing of constraints instead of strict limits.

loosened restrictions

Implies a relaxation of rules or limitations that were previously in place.

more flexible limits

Shifts the focus to flexibility, suggesting adaptability rather than strict boundaries.

wider scope

Focuses on an expanded range or area instead of constraints.

greater freedom

Highlights the increased liberty or autonomy resulting from fewer boundaries.

more permeable borders

Highlights the aspect of borders or limits becoming easier to cross or penetrate.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say "less boundaries"?

The correct way to express a reduction in boundaries is to say "fewer boundaries". "Fewer" is used with countable nouns like "boundaries", while "less" is used with uncountable nouns.

When should I use "fewer" instead of "less"?

"Fewer" should be used when referring to countable nouns (things you can count individually), such as "restrictions", "limitations", or "boundaries". "Less" should be used for uncountable nouns (things you can't count individually), such as "time", "water", or "effort".

What are some alternatives to saying "less boundaries"?

Instead of "less boundaries", you can use alternatives like "reduced limitations", "decreased restrictions", or "more flexible limits" depending on the specific context.

Is "less boundaries" grammatically correct in any context?

No, "less boundaries" is generally not grammatically correct. "Boundaries" is a countable noun, so it should be used with "fewer". The correct phrase is "fewer boundaries".