Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

less benefits for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "less benefits for" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct form should be "fewer benefits for" since "benefits" is a countable noun. Example: "The new policy will result in fewer benefits for employees compared to the previous plan."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

The cap is determined by dividing 48percentt of the league's annual revenues, less benefits for the players, among the 29 teams.

In fact, compared to CASE 1, this configuration implies less arithmetic and more memory access operations in the SISO demapper which lead to more benefits for the former operations and less benefits for the latter (Equation (21)).

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

There was much less benefit for the viewer.

So even though this proposal is good for poor people in Africa and Asia, it might mean less benefit for aid groups.

News & Media

The New York Times

And one outcome is an employment shift from industry hubs to cities where business services are strong.The result is less benefit for a given level of hiring.

News & Media

The Economist

There is less benefit for them to invest in cleaner technology if they expect to be grandfathered under the old rules when new, tougher standards are adopted.

News & Media

The New York Times

However, searching strategies provide less benefit for SMEs than for large firms (Lee et al. 2010; Spithoven et al. 2013).

With President Donald Trump in office, there's less benefit for Texas Republicans to attack him or the officials running the relief efforts.

News & Media

Huffington Post

Second, time effect: While early studies (published in 2005) show a very impressive effect of DES, later studies found less benefit for DES compared to BMS.

Science

Plosone

Likewise, diabetics studied within the Seventh Day Adventist Church revealed less benefit for American patients of African versus European ancestry when both groups adhered to the religious dietary practices of the denomination [56].

Science

Plosone

The degree of benefit was similar in the three questionnaires using a 0-10 or 1-10 scale (FIQ, SDS, and MAF), with somewhat less benefit for SF-36, using a five-point scale.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing countable items like "benefits", always use "fewer" instead of "less" to ensure grammatical accuracy. For example, say "fewer benefits" not "less benefits".

Common error

Avoid using "less" when referring to countable nouns. "Less" is for uncountable nouns (e.g., "less water"), while "fewer" is for countable nouns (e.g., "fewer options"). Using "less benefits" is a common error that can undermine the credibility of your writing.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "less benefits for" functions as a prepositional phrase that describes a disadvantage or reduction in the advantages someone receives. However, it's grammatically incorrect as noted by Ludwig AI, since "benefits" is a countable noun.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "less benefits for" appears in various sources, it is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI correctly identifies that "benefits" is a countable noun, requiring the use of "fewer" instead of "less". Therefore, the accurate and recommended phrase is "fewer benefits for". Although "less benefits for" is used in News & Media and Scientific contexts, it's crucial to prioritize grammatical correctness in formal writing. Alternatives like "reduced benefits for" and "diminished benefits for" offer semantically similar options. Always remember to use "fewer" for countable nouns to maintain clarity and credibility in your writing.

FAQs

Should I use "less" or "fewer" before "benefits"?

Always use "fewer benefits" instead of "less benefits". "Fewer" is used for countable nouns like "benefits", while "less" is used for uncountable nouns. So, saying "fewer benefits" is grammatically correct.

What are some alternatives to "less benefits for"?

Instead of "less benefits for", you can use phrases like "reduced benefits for", "diminished benefits for", or "decreased benefits for" to convey a similar meaning with better grammatical accuracy.

Is "less benefits for" ever correct?

No, "less benefits for" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. The correct phrasing is "fewer benefits for".

What is the difference between "less benefits for" and "fewer benefits for"?

"Less" is used for uncountable nouns, while "fewer" is used for countable nouns. Since "benefits" is a countable noun, the correct phrase is "fewer benefits for". Using "less" in this context is a common grammatical error.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: