less accurate for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "less accurate for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when comparing the accuracy of different methods, tools, or data sets in relation to a specific context or subject. Example: "The results from the new model are less accurate for predicting long-term trends compared to the previous version."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This result has to be considered with caution, because secondary structure predictions are less accurate for long sequences.

BMC Genomics

This algorithm accurately calculates the FPC but becomes progressively less accurate for lower order PCs.

Bioinformatics

Zillow is a bit less accurate for condo and coops than for attached or detached homes.

The Washington Post

The model allows us to describe weak deformations but become less accurate for larger deformations.

Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials

Second, the model is significantly less accurate for structured, non-random JSPs.

Artificial Intelligence

He said the HSX data had proved valuable in predicting box office receipts for blockbusters but had been less accurate for children's films.

The New York Times

So it may be best to tack in the opposite direction, with a description that is no less accurate for seeming completely illogical.

The New York Times

Such schemes are equally desirable but much less accurate for semi-explicit index-1 differential-algebraic equations (DAEs).

Journal of Computational Physics

Opponents say it is less accurate for the elderly, who buy a different mix of goods and services than other households.

The New York Times

The comparisons show that the full rotor geometry simulation gives good predictions near the optimal conditions (TSR = 5 7), but is less accurate for off-design conditions.

Renewable Energy

The method was less accurate for radiographs made before revision, for which the mean error was 0.6 mm (overestimate) ± 1.0 mm.

The Journal of Arthroplasty

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider quantifying the degree of inaccuracy when possible. Providing specific error margins or confidence intervals enhances the credibility and informativeness of your statement.

Common error

Avoid using "less accurate for" without specifying what it is less accurate compared to. Always provide a reference point or benchmark to ensure clarity. For example, instead of saying "This method is "less accurate for" predictions", specify "This method is "less accurate for" predicting long-term trends compared to short-term ones".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "less accurate for" functions as an adjective phrase modifying a noun, followed by a preposition. It qualifies the accuracy of something in relation to a specific context or purpose. Ludwig AI confirms its usability. Examples show it describing models, methods, and data in terms of reduced precision.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

78%

News & Media

18%

Academia

4%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "less accurate for" is a versatile and commonly used expression to denote reduced precision or reliability in specific contexts. As Ludwig AI underlines, it’s grammatically correct and broadly applicable. When employing this phrase, ensure you clearly define the context where the accuracy diminishes and, if feasible, quantify the degree of inaccuracy. Common mistakes involve overgeneralization, so always specify a benchmark or comparison point. Consider alternatives like "not as precise for" or "less reliable for" to add nuance. The phrase is most frequently found in science and news, indicating its suitability for formal and technical discussions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

not as precise for

Emphasizes a lack of precision rather than a complete inaccuracy.

less reliable for

Focuses on the reduced reliability or trustworthiness in a certain context.

not quite as exact for

Highlights the reduced level of exactness or correctness.

more error-prone for

Directly indicates a higher likelihood of errors in a particular situation.

less dependable for

Suggests a reduced level of dependability or consistency.

not as valid for

Indicates a decrease in validity or applicability.

less suitable for

Focuses on appropriateness, suggesting a better alternative exists.

not the best choice for

Implies there are better options available for a specific purpose.

performs worse for

Specifically describes a decrease in performance quality.

yields poorer results for

Highlights the reduced quality or effectiveness of the results obtained.

FAQs

How can I use "less accurate for" in a sentence?

You can use "less accurate for" to indicate that a method, tool, or data is not as precise or reliable in a specific situation. For example: "This model is "less accurate for" predicting rare events."

What are some alternatives to "less accurate for"?

Alternatives include "not as precise for", "less reliable for", or "more error-prone for" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it always necessary to specify why something is "less accurate for" a particular purpose?

While not always strictly necessary, specifying the reason enhances clarity and provides valuable context. It helps the reader understand the limitations and potential biases involved.

What's the difference between "less accurate for" and "inaccurate for"?

"Less accurate for" implies a relative decrease in precision, while "inaccurate for" suggests a more fundamental unsuitability or unreliability. The former indicates a matter of degree, while the latter suggests a more categorical problem.