Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
The third method uses the principle that the variance of the variance in allele lengths is expected to be larger in a constant-sized than in a growing population, assuming that the loci follow an SMM.
Similar(59)
Such shorter lengths are expected from the truncating effect of frame-shifts and stop codons.
The differences in sample sizes and sick leave lengths were expected due to the trends of decreasing new sick leave spells and lengths.
Consequently, glass optrodes of different lengths are expected to exhibit the same transmission efficiency because there is no taper slope difference to consider.
Amplicon lengths were expected to be 693 bp, 644 bp, and 634 bp for small RNA, medium RNA, and large RNA, respectively.
If functional domains are under greater selection than linker regions due to their role in enzyme activity, then, as genome sizes decrease, average protein lengths were expected to decrease while average functional domain lengths remained fixed.
In other words, U* XY is a paralinear distance to U XY, which has the following properties: 1) Under the strict additivity, the phylogenetic topology inferred from U* XY is the same as that from U XY. 2) External branch lengths tend to be overestimated, whereas internal branch lengths are expected to be unbiased.
Assuming that traits scale isometrically (that is, they grow with geometric similarity to body mass) and considering that the predictive trait (body mass) is volumetric, lengths were expected to scale to body mass0.33, measurements of area were expected to body mass0.67 and mass measurements were expected to scale to body mass.
SIMD register length is expected to double every four years.
A neigbor joining tree based on a matrix of Reynolds genetic distances is built and, under the null hypothesis of no-selection, branch length is expected to be proportional to the amount of genetic drift in each population.
The effective length is expected to be of the same order as the tip-to-tip length, i.e., ~ 30 m.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com