Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(10)
So, now let's ask what is the invariant length square of the momentum four-vector with itself.
It comprises of a thin perforated diaphragm plate welded inside a short length square hollow section.
But this relativistic length square of a four-vector is independent of velocity because the velocity here when combined with this number just cancels out.
As the particle has no momentum as seen by the particle so the components of the vector P become mc and 0. What's the length square of this vector?
The whole idea of defining four-vectors is that when you take the length square of a four-vector defined in this crazy way, 0 component squared minus the first component squared, that's the same for all people, right?
As in classical catalysis, the electrocatalytic activity is controlled by an effective Thiele modulus, which is the ratio of the surface diffusion length (mean distance from an adsorption site to the triple phase boundary) to the surface boundary layer length (square root of surface diffusivity divided by the adsorption rate constant).
Similar(50)
E and p are transforming as Lorentz variables, but m is the length squared of a four-vector; therefore, it's the same for all people.
So A.A is a positive number that measures the length squared of the vector A, likewise B.B. Now, we have to ask ourselves, "What is A.B?" So, somebody know what A.B is? Yep? Professor Ramamurti Shankar: Okay, so how do we know that?
This also clear from considering the water involved as a volume (length cubed) divided by an area (length squared) giving units of depth (length).
Each bit can be encoded on a surface area as small as the Planck length squared (~10^-66 m^2), where the entire amount of information that can be encoded is proportional to the event horizon's surface area.
Aspect ratio was calculated as length squared divided by projected area.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com