Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(4)
The length of evaluation is short, only 5 h.
Each generally took approximately 45 to 60 min per observation given that the length of evaluation, meeting, and service receiving generally does not exceed 1 to 1.5 h.
The purpose of this study was to estimate the effect of sonographic cervical length (CL) and fetal fibronectin (FFN) on length of evaluation and outcomes in women with preterm labor (PTL).
This study demonstrated very clearly, that a final conclusion on graft survival and/or regeneration might be drawn only after an adequate length of evaluation time.
Similar(56)
Notwithstanding these controversies, it is widely accepted that P3 latency reflects the length of stimulus evaluation processes, when a two-choice reaction time (RT) is required [25] and its amplitude is largely determined by stimulus relevance [26], the amount of attention allocated to the stimulus [27] and the task's complexity [28].
It is widely accepted that P3 latency reflects the length of stimulus evaluation processes [21], when two choice reaction time (RT) is required and its amplitude is largely determined by stimulus relevance, the amount of attention allocated to the stimulus, working memory and the task's complexity [22, 23].
Finally, the length of the evaluation phase (gambles presentation) was identical in all four conditions (4.5 s).
It is relevant to highlight the length of the evaluation window in comparison to some other settings.
As the length of the evaluation sessions differed from rater to rater, the intervals between sessions also varied.
Furthermore, a dimensionless parameter (relative contact length) for evaluation of lug strap joint quality is introduced which combines the important lug strap joint features into a single quantitative parameter and could be used for design of experiments (DOE) and process optimization in the industrial scale.
Study endpoints used include 100% clearance of AKs, a 75% reduction in AKs after treatment that may be more clinically relevant, length of time of evaluation, recurrence percentages, and the type of AKs cleared (clinical, subclinical, or both).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com