Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
This includes changing lane numbering and legend description (e.g. in Figure 2) into lane text labeling in the figure.
In the figure legend, description of PVN (PVN 1.03 ± 0.04…) and SON (SON 1.01 ± 0.07…) data should be switched to follow the order of subfigures.
Similar(58)
Legend descriptions are provided in Fig. 3 caption.
We have extended figure legends, descriptions of methods, and provided code.
Program music, instrumental music that carries some extramusical meaning, some "program" of literary idea, legend, scenic description, or personal drama.
Please see figure legend for description.
Figure 1C legend: the description is poor – it is a heatmap, Z score range, etc.
Figure 1C legend: the description is poor – it is a heatmap, Z score range, etc. Figure 1 figure supplement 2 is hard to read; trimming the end/uninformative part(s) would help focus on the region with similarity.
As suggested by reviewers, we have revised the figure legend (the description of DNA staining was added), and corrected the error in image processing in Figure 4 figure supplement 2 (in the previous version of the figure, we put the acetylated tubulin staining into both red and blue channel by mistake, causing the yellow color).
Table 1 Legend entry descriptions No pre-filt Pre-filtering is omitted IM MMSE The ideal MMSE solution (3) is used in the pre-filter, no secondary filter is required MMSE2 Equation (12) is used in the pre-filter and Equation (13) is used for MIMO detection with ideal CSI MSINR Equation (11) is used in the pre-filter SMI Equation (7) is used in the pre-filter.
Src siRNA caused a 62 or 67% reduction, respectively, in Src protein levels relative to either untransfected cells or cells transfected with a non-targeting control siRNA (significant differences with p<0.05; see methods and fig. legends for description of statistics for each figure) (Fig. 2A).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com