Sentence examples for legally binding requirements from inspiring English sources
Thus, the Paris pact has built in a series of legally binding requirements that countries ratchet up the stringency of their climate change policies in the future.
By contrast, the rights of landholders affected by land deals are currently governed only by voluntary agreements and overarching principles, with no legally binding requirements.
There are no legally binding requirements, and even the voluntary caps on emissions agreed so far are actually far too loose to hit the treaty's own targets.
In order to get every country to agree to the deal, including the United States, the world's largest historic carbon polluter, the Lima Accord does not include legally binding requirements that countries cut their emissions by any particular amount.
In his letter, Mr. Thompson, a Democrat who was one of the most vocal opponents of the public sale of the trailers, also demanded that the General Services Administration and FEMA provide documents by July 15 indicating how each agency has enforced the legally binding requirements on the buyers of the trailers.
Furthermore, it has to be assured that the distributed drinking water meets the legally binding requirements again after 30 days.
The 2percentt standard is just a guideline, not a legally binding requirement.
The sticking points It centres on the inclusion of a legally binding requirement for countries to step up their pledges to cut carbon emissions every five years – a clause being championed by Britain and resisted by some of the biggest hydrocarbon producers.
The work described in this article has been carried out quite long before the publication of the new EFSA guidance, but is still relevant for the discussion process on how to implement the ERA guidance as a legally binding requirement by the EC.
The then director of the DDA described that the WHO GMP certification for Nepali companies remained "optional", with the DDA's own Code on Manufacturing of Drugs the only legally binding requirement.
As such, Iran was reverting back to its legally-binding requirements of the original safeguards agreement, which did not require early declaration of nuclear-capable facilities prior to the introduction of nuclear material.
