Exact(4)
In the left-hand conditions, vibratory stimulation was applied to the left hand (T and B) while the participants viewed video-recorded flexion (F) or extension (E) hand motion of their left hand (visual velocity of ca., 3 degrees per second).
The correlation with I 1 was significantly higher than the correlation with actual length for the right hand, t(14) = 13.04, p < 0.001, and the left hand, t(14) = 9.46, p < 0.001; and the correlation with M was significantly higher than the correlation with actual length for the right foot, t(14) = 9.06, p < 0.001, and the left foot, t(14)= 8.54, p < 0.001.
After training the right hand, participants attuned to the specifying variable with both hands the correlation with actual length was significantly higher than the correlation with I 1 for the right hand, t(14) =3.40, p < 0.001, and the left hand, t(14) = 3.84, p < 0.001.
The participants who trained the right foot also generally relied on nonspecifying variables in the pretest their length judgments correlated more highly with the nonspecifying variable I 1 than with a specifying variable for the right hand, t(14) = 4,59, p < 0.001, the left hand, t(14) = 5.50, p < 0.001, the right foot, t(14) = 8.84, p < 0.001, and the left foot t(14) = 7.05, p < 0.001 (Table 6).
Similar(56)
In general the small joints of the right hand tended to show better correlation with the biometrician derived joint count compared with those of the left hand (mean kappa right hand = 0.31; left hand = 0.23; T-test P = 0.09).
The term of (sumlimits_{i = 1}^{n} {varepsilon_{i}^{*std} left( {v_{i} (t)} right)}) (left hand side) is the overall error of calculating the total wind power of a wind farm.
Paired-Samples T Test was used to compare the 2D:4D ratio between right hand and left hand in total subjects.
In addition, the interaction of salivary T and CAG repeats predicted right hand digit ratio at 12 months and left hand digit ratio at 12 months and 24 months in males.
Right hand, left hand.
Mediocre left hand.
LIFT your left hand.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com