The pair also noted that while each of the winning schools will likely be addressing issues differently, the schools' different models, including their learnings, successes and failures will be shared across the entire network.
Holsapple and Lee-Post [5] adapted the DeLone and McLean model to propose e-learning success model (Figure 1).
The research model we developed is a blend of a management information systems (MIS) success model [3], a conceptual model of Piccoli et al., [4], and an e-learning success model of Holsapple and Lee-Post [5].
"E-Learning Success Model for Instructors' Satisfactions" could be a basic guide for e-learning designers, online instructors and policy makers to understand interaction and usability outcomes related to satisfaction of instructors.
The IS success model [3, 6] and the e-learning success model [5] posit that the success of IS and e-learning systems is dependent on the intervening variables (user satisfaction and system use), which are in turn dependent on the quality of information, system, and service.
In this study, factors related to instructors' satisfaction in e-learning systems have been investigated in order to develop a basic model called "E-Learning Success Model for Instructors' Satisfactions" which is related to social, intellectual and technical interactions of instructors in whole e-learning system.
Regarding the lecturers in this survey, the mastery of these technologies is a critical factor of the e-learning success [ 35] and capacity building through continuous medical education using peer mentoring technics calls upon a profound institutional change in the management of many aspects of the teaching methods.
To address these problems, this study explores e-learning success factors via the design and evaluation of an e-learning 2.0 system.
Who transmits the learnings of success and failure and how do they do that?
Finally, we want to share the learnings, both success and failure, with the broader field.
