leadership at

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "leadership at" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to a position of leadership within a specific organization or context. Example: "Her leadership at the nonprofit organization has significantly improved community outreach efforts."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

We must show leadership at all levels.

The New York Times

The leadership at B.S.G.R. was incensed.

The New Yorker

Leadership at board level is vital.

The Guardian

Leadership at the state level is minimal.

The New York Times

This could be leadership at its best.

The New York Times

Nevertheless, the bank holiday exemplified brilliant leadership at work.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Unfortunately, we lack political leadership at all levels of government.

The New York Times

Men make up a majority of the leadership at ICE.

The New York Times

The leadership at ITER is what is rotten.

The New Yorker

Leadership, at its core, is more art than science.

The Economist

They have the potential to transform leadership at home.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "leadership at", ensure clarity by specifying the level or department within the organization (e.g., "leadership at the board level" or "leadership at the team level").

Common error

Avoid using "leadership at" without specifying the entity. For example, instead of saying "leadership at is needed", specify "leadership at the company is needed".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "leadership at" functions as a noun phrase followed by a preposition, modifying a noun. It denotes the presence or need for leadership within a specific entity or level, as evidenced by Ludwig examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

57%

Formal & Business

20%

Science

12%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

5%

Reference

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "leadership at" is a versatile phrase used to pinpoint the location or entity where leadership is present or needed. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically correct and commonly used. Its neutral register and presence across diverse sources like news media, formal business, and scientific publications make it suitable for various professional contexts. When using the phrase, ensure you specify the entity or level to avoid vagueness. You can use alternatives like "management within", "direction within", or "governance in" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey. These insights should help ensure accurate and effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

management within

Focuses on the administrative aspect of leadership, highlighting the organizational structure.

direction within

Emphasizes the guiding aspect of leadership, suggesting a focus on strategic goals.

governance in

Highlights the regulatory and policy-making role of leadership, emphasizing oversight.

guidance within

Focuses on the mentorship and support aspect of leadership, suggesting a nurturing role.

administration of

Similar to "management", but highlights the act of administering resources and policies.

supervision in

Focuses on the oversight and monitoring of activities, suggesting a hands-on approach.

helm of

Implies control and navigation, like steering a ship, and denotes someone at the top.

influence within

Highlights the power to affect decisions and actions, suggesting a more subtle form of leadership.

authority within

Emphasizes the power and right to give orders and make decisions, based on position.

control of

Suggests direct command and regulation, highlighting the enforcement aspect of leadership.

FAQs

How can I use "leadership at" in a sentence?

Use "leadership at" to indicate the level or location where leadership is exercised, such as "leadership at the board level" or "leadership at the local level".

What are some alternatives to "leadership at"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "management within", "direction within", or "governance in".

Is it correct to say "leadership in" instead of "leadership at"?

While "leadership in" can be used, "leadership at" is more specific when referring to a particular organization or level. For broader contexts, "leadership in" might be more appropriate.

What does "leadership at all levels" mean?

"Leadership at all levels" means that leadership qualities and responsibilities are expected and exercised throughout the organization, not just at the top. This encourages initiative and accountability at every tier.