The comparison of these five sequences demonstrated that variations in exon 1 could lead to different 5′ UTRs or alternative translation initiation sites.
This may lead to different ranking positions for each alternative in comparison with the other alternatives.
Tradeoffs among equity, environmental effectiveness and cost-efficiency indicate the proposals trigger similar aggregate emissions reductions but lead to different outcomes in efficiency and alternative measures of equity.
We speculate that these alternatives could lead to different pathways of regulation of clustered genes in two species and to evolutionary-progressive changes in architecture of regulatory networks, governing the activity of clustered genes in the animal kingdom.
Which, setting aside value judgments and culture-war baggage, is roughly what you'd expect: What you prioritize is what you maximize, and so both the hookup culture and the more monogamous alternatives tend to lead to different endpoints, with different benefits and costs.
Pagel et al. [2], under a slightly different model of character evolution (see above), showed that alternative priors could lead to different results, but the reasons for this were not discussed in details.
