Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The LDC scale was structured into five levels: LDC 1 – No diagnostic certainty: no diagnosis can be made.
Similar(59)
These results are also consistent with the results from eA5- and 8CPT-treated neurons in LDC (Figures 1D, 5A, 5B, 6B, 6E and 6F).
Using laser confocal microcopy, the labeling obtained with an anti-morphine sheep polyclonal antibody was compared to that of CGA [15], a specific marker of LDC vesicles [25], [26], [27], [28].
Table 1 Number of children attending LDC and FDC/IHC and number of services September quarter 2005 June quarter 2010 Changes in percentage Number of children attending services LDC 461,626 528,140 14.4 FDC and IHC Data not available 105,380 n/a Number of services / schemes LDC 4,751 5,930 24.8 FDC and IHC 408 389 −4.7 Note.
There is also a double-length monaural CD on the French Chant du Monde label (LDC 278 1000; not released in the United States) on which the composer plays eight of the preludes and fugues, along with other solo works and chamber music.
Among these approaches, ScSPM [60], LLC [62], SSC [63], LSA [68], LCSR [61] and LDC [64] have gained popularity for scene classification.
Table 2 Number of children using ECEC services by region, June quarter 2010 ECEC services Major cities of Australia Regional and remote Australia LDC 381,470 (72%) 148,610 (28%) FDC and IHC 57,020 (54%) 48,650 (46%) Note.
Furthermore, DTCTH performs better than different sparse and soft-assignment coding-based approaches including ScSPM [60], KSRSPM [65], LScSPM [66], EMK [67], LSA [68], SSC [63], and LDC [64] except LLC [62].
Among all of these approaches, only LDC [64] achieves slightly better classification accuracy (46.69%) than DTCTH (46.22%) in MIT indoor 67, but this method produces inferior results compared to DTCTH in Caltech-101 (4.09% inferior), Caltech-256 (7.36% inferior), and Scene 15 (1.13% inferior) datasets.
DTCTH achieves 78.56% accurate object classification rate by considering only the low-level feature representation, which demonstrates the improvement of performance over existing state-of-the-art methods such as SSC [63], ScSPM [60], LSPM [60], LLC [62], LCSR [61], and LDC [64], even though most of these methods use different high-level representations.
LDC 4 – High diagnostic certainty: a diagnosis is strongly favoured.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com