Sentence examples for law interferes from inspiring English sources

In Mr. Cooksey's case, it also argues that the North Carolina law interferes with the marketplace of ideas.

(AP) HARTFORD: SHERIFFS FILE SUIT Connecticut's eight elected county sheriffs filed a federal civil rights lawsuit today claiming that a new state law interferes with their constitutional right to free expression and assembly.

Here then is the test as Dworkin formulates it: If a group protests that a generally applicable law interferes with a "sacred duty," then "the legislature must consider whether equal concern for that group requires an exemption".

In striking down the law, the federal appeals court in Boston found that a state has no authority to regulate conduct beyond its borders and that the Massachusetts law "interferes with the ability of the federal government to speak with one voice".

The defendant sets up that the statute, if applicable to it, is contrary to the Constitution of the United States, that it impairs the obligation of contracts, takes property without due process of law, interferes with commerce between New Jersey and New York, denies the privileges of citizens of New Jersey to citizens of other states, and denies to them the equal protection of the laws.

The giant chain retailer, Total Wine & More filed suit against that regulation, arguing the law interferes with interstate commerce in a way that the 2005 Supreme Court decision known as "Granholm" prohibits when it recognized the right of wineries to ship direct to consumers across state lines.

Headscarves and high heels: can the law interfere with what we wear?

The decision calling the provisions unconstitutional was a victory for the Obama administration, which argued that the law interfered with the federal government's authority over immigration.

Q2: Are there any instances or cases in the United States when a state enacted anti-Sharia Law legislation and the law interfered with a judge's ability to adjudicate fairly, thus jeopardizing American citizens' civil and constitutional rights?

After conducting our own pre-emption analysis, we considered the agency's explanation of how state law interfered with its regulation, regarding it as further support for our independent conclusion that the plaintiff's tort claim obstructed the federal regime.

A 2008 Supreme Court decision struck down a Washington, D.C., law that required weapons to be stored disassembled or to have trigger locks on the grounds that the law interfered with the right to self-defense; a handful of states still mandate the safety features.