later evidence

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "later evidence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to evidence that is presented or discovered after an initial point in time or after previous evidence has been considered. Example: "The later evidence presented in the trial significantly changed the jury's perspective on the case."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Academia

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

53 human-written examples

Later evidence confirms his observation.

The New York Times

Later evidence fails to support the existence of graves.

The New York Times - Books

Decades later, evidence of the Unit 731 atrocities still troubles relations between China and Japan.

Columbia University

If later evidence points to criminality, the F.B.I. can take over.

The New York Times

They may have been connected with a heavenly divinity, as later evidence suggests.

Britannica

Later evidence, supplied by video and broadcast tape, dashed such hopes".

The New York Times - Books

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

7 human-written examples

In the discussions of the ongoing research in the Central Offce of Information and the Ministry of Health can be seen in embryo the emergent evaluative paradigm of "relevant research," a precursor of later evidence-based tendencies in health research.

Bulletin of the History of Medicine

A significant proportion of bacteria remained lodged in the pharyngeal cells (as later evidenced by the electron microscopy results).

BMC Genomics

This oncogenic attitude of PVT1 gained support from later evidences of frequent upregulation [ 21, 31– 35] and amplification in a wide variety of cancers.

BioMed Research International

After DNA evidence later re-incriminated Hennis, he was placed back on death row.

Vice

Later, other evidence was said to emerge.

The Guardian - Books

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When presenting "later evidence", clearly establish the initial understanding or belief to emphasize how the new evidence alters or enhances the previous view. This provides context and highlights the significance of the updated information.

Common error

Avoid presenting "later evidence" as the definitive truth without acknowledging potential limitations or alternative interpretations. Acknowledge uncertainties and remaining questions to maintain credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "later evidence" functions as a noun phrase, where "later" modifies the noun "evidence". It typically acts as a subject or object in a sentence, referring to facts or information presented after an initial point of reference. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

38%

Encyclopedias

15%

Science

29%

Less common in

Academia

8%

Wiki

8%

Formal & Business

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "later evidence" is a commonly used and grammatically correct term that refers to information surfacing after an initial point in time. Ludwig AI validates its grammatical correctness and wide applicability. It is most frequently used in news, encyclopedias, and scientific contexts, signaling a need to update or revise previous understandings. When using the phrase, it's important to contextualize the initial perspective and avoid presenting "later evidence" as the absolute truth, acknowledging potential limitations. Alternative phrases like "subsequent proof" or "additional findings" can offer nuanced emphasis. Remember to properly cite sources and explain the context when presenting "later evidence" in any argument.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

subsequent proof

Replaces "evidence" with "proof" and "later" with "subsequent", highlighting the chronological order of the information.

additional findings

Focuses on the investigative aspect, using "findings" instead of "evidence" to emphasize the results of an inquiry.

newly discovered facts

Highlights the discovery process and the factual nature of the information.

emerging data

Emphasizes the gradual appearance of the evidence, often in a scientific or data-driven context.

follow-up evidence

Suggests a sequential investigation, where the evidence is a direct result of previous inquiries.

retrospective evidence

Indicates that the evidence comes from looking back at past events or data.

supporting documentation

Emphasizes the role of the evidence in bolstering a claim or argument.

corroborating details

Focuses on the aspect of confirming or validating existing information with new evidence.

further substantiation

Highlights the act of providing additional proof or support to an existing claim.

new testimonial

Specifically refers to evidence in the form of a statement or testimony.

FAQs

How does "later evidence" influence decision-making?

"Later evidence" often prompts a reevaluation of initial assumptions and can lead to revised strategies or conclusions. It's crucial in fields like science, law, and business where continuous learning and adaptation are essential.

What's the difference between "subsequent evidence" and "later evidence"?

While both terms are similar, "later evidence" generally refers to evidence that emerges at some point after an initial observation, while "subsequent evidence" implies a more direct and immediate follow-up to a prior event or discovery. The distinction is subtle but can affect the perceived relationship between the pieces of evidence.

In what contexts is "later evidence" particularly important?

"Later evidence" is critical in legal proceedings to overturn wrongful convictions, in scientific research to refine theories, and in historical analysis to correct inaccuracies. Its significance lies in its potential to challenge and improve existing understandings.

How should I present "later evidence" in an argument?

When presenting "later evidence", make sure to clearly cite your sources and explain the context in which the evidence emerged. Highlight how the new evidence supports or contradicts previous claims, and address any potential counterarguments or limitations.