Exact(1)
WACHTEL--Audrey, beloved wife of the late H.
Similar(59)
In contrast, between the late H/M ratio at 2 h p.i. and the late H/M ratio at 4 h p.i. the percentage of patients who exceeded a difference of 0.10 was much lower (19%%).
At the patient level, a high percentage of patients (50%%) exceeded a difference of 0.10 between the late H/M ratio at 1 h p.i. compared to the late H/M ratio at 4 h p.i.
However, compared with the late H/M ratio at 4 h p.i., the late H/M ratios at 1, 2 and 3 h p.i. did not exceed the predefined clinically relevant cut-off difference of 0.10.
In the non-ischaemic HF group only the mean late H/M ratio at 1 h p.i. exceeded the predefined clinically relevant 0.10 difference with the late H/M ratio 4 h p.i.
Figure 3 shows the mean differences in late H/M ratios at 1, 2 and 3 h p.i. compared with the late H/M ratio at 4 h p.i. in both subgroups.
In comparison with the late H/M ratios at 3 and 4 h p.i.
Statistically significant mean differences were observed between the late H/M ratios at 1, 2 and 3 h p.i. compared with the late H/M ratio at 4 h p.i. (0.09, 0.05 and 0.02, respectively).
There were statistically significant differences between the late H/M ratios at 1, 2 and 3 h p.i. compared with the late H/M ratio at 4 h p.i.
An example of a patient with only small differences between the late H/M ratios at 1, 2 and 3 h p.i. compared with the late H/M ratio at 4 h p.i. is depicted in Fig. 2.
The late H/M ratios at 1, 2 and 3 h p.i. were compared with the late H/M ratio at 4 h p.i. with a linear mixed model with a given fixed factor time.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com