lasting two hours

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "lasting two hours" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe the duration of an event, activity, or experience. Example: "The meeting is scheduled for 10 AM, lasting two hours, so we should be finished by noon."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Travel

Arts

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

40 human-written examples

Rarely can a struggle lasting two hours and 47 minutes have swung so violently.

The Guardian - Sport

Polato points to a "power bar" which, he said, gives an energy boost lasting two hours.

The Guardian

"La Magia," lasting two hours, consists of seven extended excerpts from longer ballets.

The New York Times - Arts

A Spotlight Tour lasting two hours features interactions with various animals and costs $22, $18 for children.

The New York Times - Travel

conducted a teleconference lasting two hours on Tuesday to collect information from experts in a number of countries.

The New York Times - Health

The luncheon, which this reporter attended, was a lively one, lasting two hours at Michael's in Midtown Manhattan.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

20 human-written examples

Xbox One's Indie Strategy Isn't Whichng Just Yended

Vice

The hearing lasted two hours.

The New Yorker

This session lasted two hours.

Harvard University

The debate will last two hours.

The New Yorker

The meeting instead lasted two hours.

The New York Times - Health

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing events or activities, use the phrase "lasting two hours" to clearly indicate the duration. For enhanced readability, place this phrase directly after the subject, such as "The meeting, lasting two hours, covered several key topics."

Common error

Avoid using "lasting two hours" when you intend to describe an event that recurs every two hours. Instead, use "every two hours" or "at two-hour intervals" to accurately convey the frequency.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "lasting two hours" typically functions as a participial phrase modifying a noun, providing information about the duration of something. Ludwig examples show this phrase used to describe events, matches, tours, and sessions, adding detail about their temporal extent.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

35%

Travel

8%

Less common in

Arts

8%

Wiki

6%

Academia

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "lasting two hours" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression to specify the duration of an event or activity. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage, and the provided examples from reputable sources like The New York Times and The Guardian demonstrate its versatility across various contexts including news, science, and travel. While alternatives such as "with a duration of two hours" exist, they may carry slightly different connotations or levels of formality. When using this phrase, be sure to clarify whether you are describing a one-time event or a recurring phenomenon to avoid ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

with a duration of two hours

Focuses on the duration as a specific attribute.

spanning a two-hour period

Highlights the period of time covered.

a two-hour long event

Emphasizes the event's length.

extending over two hours

Suggests a continuous extension of time.

occupying two hours of time

Highlights the time being taken up.

having a two-hour timeframe

Similar to "duration", but uses "timeframe".

consuming two hours

Implies the use of time.

taking up two hours

Focuses on time being used or occupied.

a two-hour stint

Indicates a period of activity or work.

for a period of two hours

A more formal and general way to state the duration.

FAQs

How can I use "lasting two hours" in a sentence?

You can use "lasting two hours" to describe the duration of an event. For example, "The conference call, lasting two hours, covered the quarterly results".

What are some alternatives to "lasting two hours"?

Alternatives include phrases like "with a duration of two hours", "spanning a two-hour period", or "a two-hour long event".

Is it correct to say "a meeting lasting two hours" or "a two-hour meeting"?

Both are correct, but they have slightly different emphasis. "A meeting lasting two hours" emphasizes the duration, while "a two-hour meeting" acts as a compound adjective describing the meeting.

How does the context affect the choice of using "lasting two hours"?

In more formal contexts, you might prefer "with a duration of two hours". In less formal contexts, "a two-hour session" might be more appropriate.