lasted all of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "lasted all of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate the total duration of an event or experience, often emphasizing that it was longer than expected. Example: "The meeting lasted all of three hours, which was much longer than we had planned."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

That lasted all of five minutes.

The New York Times - Sports

Mr Abe lasted all of a year.

The Economist

The intrigue lasted all of five minutes.

The New York Times - Sports

The breakup lasted all of six weeks.

The New York Times

It lasted all of five songs.

The Guardian - Music

Well, that lasted all of a day.

The New York Times

The discussion lasted all of 18 minutes.

The New York Times

That lasted all of two weeks.

The New York Times - Food

The attack on Thursday lasted all of seven seconds.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

2 human-written examples

But its new-year euphoria lasted all of 24 hours.

The Economist

" Interview lasted all of 2min.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "lasted all of" to emphasize the total duration, especially when it might be surprisingly short or long. For instance, "The meeting lasted all of five minutes" underscores its brevity.

Common error

Avoid using "lasted all of" when simply stating a duration without any intention of emphasizing or highlighting its length. In neutral contexts, a simpler phrase like "lasted for" is often more appropriate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "lasted all of" functions as a verbal phrase to specify the duration of an event, action, or state. It emphasizes the total time something continued, as shown in Ludwig examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

98%

Formal & Business

1%

Science

1%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Academic

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "lasted all of" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression to denote the duration of an event, often with added emphasis. Ludwig AI analysis reveals it's most common in News & Media contexts. While generally neutral in register, it's important to use it when you want to highlight the length of time, be it surprisingly short or unexpectedly long. As Ludwig AI shows, reputable sources like The New York Times and The Guardian commonly employ this phrase.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

extended for the duration of

Emphasizes the duration or period over which something happened.

continued throughout

Highlights the uninterrupted nature of an event or state.

filled the entirety of

Emphasizes that something completely used up the available time.

persisted for

Implies a sense of endurance or continuation despite potential obstacles.

spanned a length of

Highlights the measurement or extent of time that something covered.

occupied a period of

Focuses on the time frame that something filled or took up.

endured for

Suggests that something withstood a test of time or hardship.

held out for

Implies resistance or resilience over a specific duration.

stretched across

Indicates that something extended or reached over a certain time frame.

went on for

A more informal way to express the duration of an event.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "lasted all of" in a sentence?

You can use alternatives like "extended for the duration of", "continued throughout", or "persisted for" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "lasted all of"?

Yes, "lasted all of" is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase to emphasize the duration of an event or period.

What does "lasted all of" imply?

The phrase "lasted all of" typically implies that the duration was either surprisingly short or notably long, adding emphasis to the time period.

When should I use "lasted all of" instead of "lasted for"?

Use "lasted all of" when you want to emphasize the duration. If you're simply stating the duration without adding emphasis, "lasted for" is generally more appropriate.