Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
The largest previously published radiologic series of pathologically confirmed CNS IDD cases (n = 40), included only a single example with associated mass effect and oedema.
The largest previously published clinicopathologic published series of CNS IDD consisted of 31 biopsy proven cases, but clinical and imaging follow-up in this series was limited and it was not clear how many patients actually had an MRI versus a computed tomographic (CT) scan (Kepes, 1993).
Similar(58)
The data was taken from a larger, previously published trial that looked at 275 transplant patients to determine the safety and efficacy of using immunosuppressant drugs on HIV patients.
Additionally, expression of these transcripts was detected in ≤5% of the never and current smokers in the larger previously published dataset[8] of never and current smokers.
We re-examined a larger, previously published dataset [7] and also found significantly lower MAFG levels in smokers with lung cancer (n = 90) compared with that in smokers without cancer (n = 97) (Supporting Information S1).
The depressed sample was recruited from a larger previously published study [ 20].
We created datasets based on a large, previously published diagnostic study on 2 different tests (D-dimer test and calf difference test) with a nested case control design.
We will further investigate these putative biomarkers in a larger, previously published cohort together with functional studies of the complex protein expression observed.
In the present study we have used an analogous model to study PMN reactivity towards anti-CII ICs, using the subset of patients representing the highest and lowest anti-CII levels in a larger previously published serological study [ 1].
The largest series previously published was by Schwarzmaier et al.
However, the total time under closed-loop control in our study (576 h) was comparable with the largest of previously published studies comprising experiments lasting ≥24 h (578 h) (13) and was greater than in other recent studies (6, 12, 14, 15).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com