Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(60)
The largest differences were found between the maps of 1990 and 1991.
The largest differences were reflected in the content of hemicellulose, which might influence methane production.
Both species produced similar stemflow volumes and the largest differences were found among trees of the same species.
The largest differences were obtained for the parent decline curves evaluated with the hockey-stick (HS) model.
In all cases, the largest differences were attained at the lowest point density (1 point m−2).
The largest differences were found at regions in the reactor where recirculation occurred, for example in the wake region of a lamp.
Furthermore, the biggest differences were in patients with non-cemented stems, and of those, the largest differences were seen in patients with fully coated CoCr stems.
It is both clear and logical that the largest differences were obtained in substations that share lines of high and low voltage.
For both parameters, the largest differences were achieved for a high temporal correlation coefficient very close to one where expected accuracies rapidly degrade.
We found that the aboveground biomass of riparian vegetation was higher in the watershed with Alder, but the largest differences were in the litter layer and belowground where vegetation in the watershed with no Alder had significantly higher root biomass.
In terms of bolus size, the 2 g and 1 g boluses produced the least and greatest relative within-subject variability, respectively; the largest differences were found for cycle duration and excursions.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com