larger enough to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "larger enough to" is not correct in written English.
The correct expression should be "large enough to." Example: "The box is large enough to hold all of the supplies we need for the project."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

Numerical results show that is larger enough to achieve the best channel estimation performance with negligible loss compared to the case of larger.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

He only counts areas of around 3,100 square kilometres (1,200 square miles) or larger – enough to create a sound buffer around a central point of absolute quiet.

BBC

Thus, it appears that when the tumors have developed and are larger enough to necessitate culling of the mice, the effect of expression of the ST3Gal-I transgene may not be able to compound the effect of endogenous aberrant glycosylation.

Glycobiology

In general, the under-sampling method is used to reduce the learning time of a classification algorithm when the data size is larger enough to represent characteristics of the data, while the over-sampling method is used to increase the performance of a classification algorithm.

BioData Mining

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

53 human-written examples

Most dishes are large enough to share.

The New York Times

The portion was large enough to share.

The New York Times

Each portion is large enough to share, but not large enough to overwhelm.

The New York Times - Travel

It needs to be large enough to be meaningful.

The New Yorker

It was large enough to do so, for a time.

The Economist

But it would be large enough to fit the "Sphere".

The New York Times

The canals were large enough to accommodate seagoing vessels.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use "large enough to" instead of "larger enough to". The latter is grammatically incorrect in standard English.

Common error

Don't use comparative adjectives like "larger" when you simply need to indicate that something meets a certain size requirement. Stick to the base adjective, such as "large enough", to maintain grammatical accuracy.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "larger enough to" functions as an adjective phrase intended to describe the size or capacity of something. However, it's grammatically incorrect. Ludwig indicates the correct form is "large enough to".

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "larger enough to" is grammatically incorrect; the correct form is "large enough to". Ludwig identifies it as such. While it appears in some sources, particularly Science and News & Media, it's best to avoid using it. Opt for alternatives like ""large enough to"", "big enough to", or "sufficiently large to" for clearer and more accurate communication. Remember to consider the context when choosing the most appropriate alternative.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

big enough to

Replaces "larger" with "big", a common synonym, making the phrase grammatically correct.

sufficiently large to

Uses "sufficiently" to emphasize adequacy in size, offering a more formal tone.

large enough

Shortened form without "to" emphasizing its size property.

sufficiently big to

Combines 'sufficiently' and 'big' to emphasize size and adequacy.

of sufficient size to

Rephrases to emphasize the characteristic of having enough size, more formal.

adequately sized to

Uses "adequately" to describe the size concerning its appropriateness for a task.

generously sized to

Expresses the size as ample and beyond what's merely adequate.

substantial enough to

Emphasizes the size as considerable and significant.

ample enough to

Highlights that something is present in great quantity and/or size.

capacious enough to

Indicates a space or container that is large and can hold a great deal.

FAQs

How to properly use "large enough to" in a sentence?

Use "large enough to" when you want to indicate that something's size meets a specific requirement or enables a particular action. For example, "The room is "large enough to" accommodate all the guests".

What is a grammatically correct alternative to "larger enough to"?

The correct phrase is "large enough to". You can also use phrases like "big enough to" or "sufficiently large to" depending on the context.

Is there a subtle difference in meaning between "large enough to" and "big enough to"?

While both "large enough to" and "big enough to" convey a similar meaning, "large" can sometimes imply a more formal or technical context, whereas "big" is generally more informal. The choice depends on the tone you're aiming for.

When should I use "sufficiently large to" instead of "large enough to"?

Use "sufficiently large to" when you want to emphasize that something isn't just meeting the minimum requirement, but is adequately sized for a particular purpose or task. This phrasing adds a layer of emphasis on adequacy.