Sentence examples for larger alphabets from inspiring English sources

Yet it remains popular not only in countries that use Latin-based languages, such as America, Britain and most of Europe, but also in China, Japan and most of Asia, where written languages often have much larger alphabets.

Hence, running time can easily get prohibitive, in particular if we consider larger alphabets of elements, or have to perform many decompositions.

For larger alphabets higher order trees, such as octrees, can be considered.

Larger alphabets frequently improve performance of coevolution algorithms (MI, NMI, and MIp in particular) on the myosin data set, but there is no obvious relationship between alphabet size and coevolution algorithm performance on the myoglobin data.

Note that edit distance is well defined on larger alphabet and variable length strings.

Finally, we repeat the same comparison in Figure 12 for υ=4 in order to demonstrate the effect of using larger alphabet size.

We also show that our character embedding can employ a larger alphabet at little to no additional cost, further enhancing performance, as training time scales logarithmically with alphabet size instead of linearly.

The PubChem molecular structure representation has a larger alphabet of bond types than that which is in common use by most software, which can in principle be used to good effect, but in practice this is not necessarily the case.

In this work, we focused on the binary case of q=2 different symbols for generating the code (mathcal {X}), but in (universal) fingerprinting, it may be advantageous to work with larger alphabet sizes q>2, since the code length decreases linearly with q [38, 39].

It is understood that the more elements an unknown compound may contain, the harder it is to identify its molecular formula: the decompositions of the monoisotopic mass of the compound constitute its candidate molecular formulas, and the number of decompositions increases significantly if we consider a larger alphabet of elements.

For example, the character A is mapped to p, while a is mapped to 2. The use of a larger alphabet produces a more thorough obfuscation than that of ROT13; for example, a telephone number such as +1-415-839-6885 is not obvious at first sight from the scrambled result Z'\c'd\gbh\eggd.