Suggestions(2)
Exact(4)
The A400M was created to give Europe's Nato partners independent access to heavy aircraft to transport troops and large weaponry.
We know about the report from NK News about images - which could not be confirmed - showing large weaponry facing a very close target, a viewing area and several passenger vehicles.
Males with large weaponry may also be able to impose more damage on rivals during escalated contests.
As a result, most traditional Chinese cricket fights probably escalate to grappling – precisely the stage where our results suggest large weaponry would be most advantageous.
Similar(56)
Males with proportionately larger weaponry won more fights and increasing differences in weaponry size between males increased the fighting success of the male with the larger weaponry.
We conducted two experiments to test the hypothesis that relatively larger weaponry conveys an advantage to males in aggressive contests.
We used binomial tests [64] to evaluate the prediction that males with larger weaponry would win contests more often than males with smaller weaponry.
We predict that, after experimentally controlling for male body size differences: 1) males with larger weaponry will win more staged fights than males with smaller weaponry, and 2) an increase in the difference in weaponry size between males will increase the likelihood of a win for the male with the larger weaponry.
There is evidence that selection for larger weaponry through male-male combat found in G. pennsylvanicus may explain a broader pattern of morphology within North American field crickets.
Similarly, wider heads, longer maxillae, longer mandibles, and greater maxillae spans would lead to greater maximum gape, allowing males with larger weaponry to grasp the heads of opponents during combat.
Although the vast majority of studies have shown that males with larger weaponry are better fighters (see Introduction), to be conservative we used two-tailed tests throughout the manuscript.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com