Similar(60)
Liu, K., Linder, C. R. & Warnow, T. RAxML and FastTree: comparing two methods for large-scale maximum likelihood phylogeny estimation.
Large-scale Maximum Likelihood phylogenies were constructed using 1336 nematode taxa and utilised four closely related metazoan phyla [ 31] as outgroup taxa (Nematomorpha, Priapulida, Kinorhyncha, and Tardigrada).
The large-scale Maximum Likelihood topologies recovered in this study agree broadly with previously published nematode phylogenies [ 7, 9, 10], recovering all major nematode clades and providing increased resolution at certain nodes.
Structural alignments were used to construct large-scale Maximum Likelihood trees using Randomized Axelerated Maximum Likelihood (RAxML) version 7.04 [ 63, 64], hosted at the Vital-IT unit of the Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (http://phylobench.vital-it.ch/raxml-bb/).
For classification, full-length proteins were clustered and large-scale maximum-likelihood phylogenies built from alignments of PP domains (MAFFT6.24) with statistical support from the approximate Likelihood Ratio Test as implemented by PhyML3.0.
The autocorrelation function shows regular oscillations at large scale, with maxima at a distance of 200, 650, 850, 1300, 1500 and 2050 genes and minima at a distance of 550, 900 and from 1750 to 1950 genes.
This study developed a novel large scale spatio-temporal model of maximum daily river temperature (Twmax) for Scotland that predicts variability in both river temperature and climate sensitivity.
Of course, this engagement can be automated for maximum effectiveness on a large scale with healthy ROI.
Therefore, the large scale structure of the turbulence is a key input if the maximum particle energy is calculated.
Energy enhancements from large scale to smaller scale were explained by the dissipative spectrum which showed maximum energy enhancement in the inertial subrange followed by a decaying trend.
Large scale search is performed with the large step size to find the point with maximum definition.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com