These, however, are not representations of ordinary language; rather, they constitute what the American philosopher Nelson Goodman has called the "languages of art".
These questions have been discussed by Richard Wollheim in Art and Its Objects (1968), and again by Goodman in Languages of Art (see above).
His Languages of Art (1968) was the first work of analytical philosophy to produce a distinct and systematic theory of art.
It is this tentative fusion of two cultural "languages of art," already in touch for two or three centuries, that gave a special impetus to the new Mycenaean world, rendering it flexible, receptive, and adventurous.
These, however, are not representations of ordinary language; rather, they constitute what the American philosopher Nelson Goodman has called the "languages of art". These "languages," or semiotic systems, are systems of signs that are used for expressive and representational purposes.
In a sense, "seeing as" is similar to what Nelson Goodman, in Languages of Art, suggests happens in pictures, where like in language representations refer (and have a corresponding grammar of syntactic and semantic rules).
