"language sense" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it to describe someone's ability to understand and use language appropriately, such as in the sentence: "She showed a remarkable language sense and fluency when writing her essay."
In the ordinary language sense of the word it is a fact.
In the brain they have found a physical basis for all our thoughts, aspirations, language, sense of consciousness, moral beliefs and everything else that makes us human.
It is often possible to translate probabilis as 'probable' in an ordinary language sense, but attention should be paid to meanings arising from a combination with particular nouns.
In order to get clear on this point, discussion of the identity theory has naturally been conducted in the context of the Fregean semantical hierarchy, which distinguishes between levels of language, sense, and reference.
The researchers also noted that students confused terminology, namely the terms "adapt" and "fitness" were used in an everyday language sense rather than within a scientific context of evolution.
It undermined the hope of pursuing it with confidence in our language, sense of ethics, and perceptions.
Here a singular understanding of European modernity falls away in the multiple complexity sustained by female bodies in their movement through language, senses and belonging, and their insistence to exist.
In any natural-language sense of 'singular', these phrases do not introduce something into discussion by means of 'a singular, definitely identifying substantival expression', simply because the referring expressions in such cases are not singular but plural.
First, under the standard definition, an aggregation rule is defined extensionally, not intensionally: it is a mapping (functional relationship) between individual inputs and collective outputs, not a set of explicit instructions (a rule in the ordinary-language sense) that could be extended to inputs outside the function's formal domain.
Thus the significance of the term 'liquid', for example, in its nominal use, is such that there is no natural-language sense of the noun for which, if there is acetic acid in distinct containers, the liquid in one of the containers could be said to be a different liquid from the liquid in another.[22] The acetic acid in my glass cannot be said to be the same acetic acid as that in yours.
That is "secret" not in its normal English-language sense of "not in the public view" but in its national security sense of "closed-door hearings where classified information is disseminated".
