Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Another approach is to build a dedicated language identifier which runs separately before any other processing steps take place.
Similar(59)
About 60% of the clusters of operons had scores of at least 0.3 at the broad category level (Fig. 1) and about 40% at the SEED subsystem level (which is more specific as it comprises natural language identifiers).
Our fifth research question was Was tool support available for dealing with cross-language identifiers?
89 respondents (68%) reported that special care was taken when changing cross-language identifiers.
RQ5: Was tool support available for dealing with cross-language identifiers?
12% reported avoidance of the use of multiple programming languages, and 21% reported avoidance of cross-language identifiers in general.
RQ6: Is tool support considered important, and if so, which functions for handling cross-language identifiers are most important?
The problems which occurred most with 80 respondents (62%) are bugs or issues resulting from changing cross-language identifiers.
60 respondents (46%) admitted to refraining from changing cross-language identifiers at all for fear of breaking the system.
Only about 20 30% of respondents reported actual measures against cross-language linking issues; many indicated avoidance of multi-language development, cross-language linking, or changing cross-language identifiers.
Dedicated tools for handling cross-language identifiers were used by 27 respondents (21%), and specialized test cases for detecting cross-language issues were used by 39 respondents (30%).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com