Exact(1)
We rejected one outlier subject from the language control group based on his behavioural responses from Experiment 2. For the syntactic experiment the number of averaged trials did not show any group differences (33 = language control, 34 = G-SLI, 40 = age control, F2,53 = 2.14, p>0.12).
Similar(59)
Another study done among children with specific language disorders and a control group showed that children with speech language disorders produced phonological processes more often than the normal controls (p < 0.005) [ 19].
Language learners in the control group were merely taught the grammatical features of the language to be learned.
The intervention group had lived a shorter time in Sweden, had a higher prevalence of obesity and smoking, a lower employment rate, and poorer language skills than the control group (P < 0.05).
If no significant clusters of activation were identified within the inferior frontal gyrus, a region of interest defined by the group activation in left inferior frontal gyrus of language related activity from the control group was used for the speech runs and a region of interest of song activity from the autism group was used for the song runs.
Previous research on the effects of peer-editing in bringing about language development generally examined the linguistic performance of only a few students and did not focus on specific language errors nor used a control group.
Inclusionary criteria for the control group were language skills within the average range.
The other tests have been added to obtain a more complete picture of these children's language skills, relative to the control group.
A group of 51 normal adults (30 female) with mean age of 33.0 years (SD 0.7) who had no history of language impairment served as a control group for the adult NE family members.
There are 93 studies in Chinese language and 141 studies in English language with the sample size of control group more than 100.
Although we focused mainly on a vulnerable group of PLBW children and looked for correlates of attention problems, the language items included (especially at 36 months) might have constrained the variability of language skills observed, especially for the control group (ceiling effect).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com