landmark with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "landmark with" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to describe a landmark associated with something, but it lacks context and clarity. Example: "The city is known for its landmark with historical significance."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

But Cook credited Landmark with helping her to "complete relationships I'd ignored or walked out on.

The New York Times

The de Menil house is a Modernist landmark with its own personality.

The New York Times

And none would have reached the landmark with a more defining shot.

The Guardian - Sport

It's also a landmark, with two women featuring on the same list for the first time.

The Guardian

In Bamian, the New Zealand base is a local landmark, with a model kiwi atop its roof.

The New York Times

This year, Green-Wood bought the building, now a landmark, with plans to make it a visitors' center.

The New York Times

Recently, Caroline staged a very public lunch at Sylvia's, the Harlem landmark, with Al Sharpton, another self-made pol.

The Guardian - Opinion

The four-story national landmark with the striking stained-glass windows is now existing month to month.

The New York Times

"THE ONCE AND FUTURE CONEY ISLAND" covers the evolution of this landmark with a stop for lunch.

The New York Times - Arts

Built as a bachelors' residence in 1890, it is a designated landmark, with its lobby murals still intact.

The New York Times

Regla María González has spent about $6,000 restoring her gracious apartment in the López Serrano Building, a 1932 landmark with reliefs and a setback tower.

The New York Times - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing landmarks, favor precise terms such as "featuring", "characterized by", or "associated with" over the vague "with" to ensure clarity and grammatical correctness.

Common error

Avoid using "with" loosely to connect a landmark and its attributes. This can create ambiguous sentences. Instead, clarify the relationship using more descriptive prepositions.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "landmark with" functions as a descriptive element, attempting to connect a landmark to its attributes. However, its grammatical function is often weak and vague. As Ludwig AI explains, the phrase doesn't always convey a clear meaning and lacks context.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

46%

Science

31%

Wiki

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Encyclopedias

3%

Reference

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "landmark with" is frequently used, as highlighted by Ludwig's examples. However, Ludwig AI points out that it is grammatically questionable due to its vagueness. While it appears across various contexts, from news media to scientific articles, its lack of precision makes it a less desirable choice in formal writing. Opting for alternatives such as "landmark featuring", "landmark known for", or "landmark associated with" ensures greater clarity and grammatical correctness, enhancing the overall quality of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

landmark associated with

Highlights historical or cultural connections of the landmark.

landmark known for

Emphasizes the landmark's popular reputation or fame.

landmark featuring

Replaces 'with' to specify a prominent characteristic of the landmark.

landmark notable for

Emphasizes what makes the landmark particularly significant.

landmark recognized for

Focuses on widespread acknowledgement or acclaim of the landmark.

landmark characterized by

Uses a more formal structure to highlight distinctive attributes.

landmark that includes

Specifies inclusions and structural components of the landmark.

landmark displaying

Highlights key visual or artistic elements of the landmark.

landmark adorned with

Indicates decorative or ornamental aspects of the landmark.

landmark in conjunction with

Suggests a coordinated functionality or event that accompanies the landmark.

FAQs

How can I make my descriptions of landmarks more precise?

Instead of using the phrase "landmark with", try alternatives like "landmark featuring", "landmark characterized by", or "landmark known for" to provide clearer context.

What's a more formal way to describe a landmark's features instead of saying "landmark with"?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases like "landmark distinguished by" or "landmark notable for". These options enhance clarity and sophistication in your writing.

Which phrase is more grammatically sound, "landmark with" or "landmark associated with"?

"Landmark associated with" is generally more grammatically sound. "Landmark with" is often vague, while "associated with" specifies a clear relationship or connection.

When is it appropriate to use "landmark with", and when should I choose a different phrase?

While "landmark with" is frequently used, it's often better to opt for a more descriptive phrase like "landmark featuring" or "landmark known for" to avoid ambiguity and enhance clarity in your descriptions.