The similarity between phase lag conditions for both temporal coordination (i.e., relative timing aspects between muscles and/or limbs) and reflex intensities suggested that they may be controlled by the same subcortical circuitry.
In order to prevent short-term association from influencing the results, the same unrelated PD-T2 pairs were used in both the short and long lag conditions of any given version of the experiment.
Table 1 reports the mean accuracy rates for both phases under the two lag conditions.
Thus again, unlike the masked conditions, repetition suppression in the long-lag conditions, like the behavioral priming, appeared sensitive to face familiarity.
(ii) T1-locked analysis: To compare affective modulation at lag 2 with the other lag conditions at a fixed temporal relationship to T1, we selected the same time range as used for the lag 2 analysis of T2 (i.e., 120 280 ms following T2 at lag 2, which corresponds to 352 502 ms after T1) for all lag conditions.
Because the Lag factor did not have important effects on IGT performance, and in order to increase statistical power, data were collapsed across Lag conditions in all the remaining analysis.
Examining a time window ranging from 352 to 502 ms following T1 onset across all lag conditions, we observed a lag × content interaction (F 4,48) = 3.3, p < 0.018; see Figure 4, left panel).
At lag 2, ssVEP amplitudes to T2 onset matched the level of the amplitudes in the other lag conditions in which T2 occurred later than the window examined here.
The design of the experiment was such that, for each of these lag conditions, there were ten trials for every T1 T2 Trial Type (i.e., threat, positive and neutral trials).
During lag conditions or if you are in a high-ping server, it is recommended that you keep pressing 'E' or Action key as you approach the car.
