Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
lacks of
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "lacks of" is not correct in written English.
The correct phrase would be "lack of". For example, "The school's lack of funding was a significant obstacle to completing the project."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
She found the library easy to find, despite the lacks of signs.
News & Media
Finally, this study lacks of a dramatically innovative methodology.
So, Hadoop system also lacks of providing sufficient security facilities.
However, this modernization process lacks of a systematic approach.
On the other hand, the extension to elliptical boundaries seems not straightforward and lacks of attention.
Despite this change, the main lacks of the LEAP protocol are the lacks of this protocol, in particular the absence of a rekeying solution.
Moreover, the interaction between graphene and derivatives and stem cell still lacks of research [39, 40].
Science
Moreover, Chinese academia still lacks of comprehensive, overall and in-depth analysis and research.
Usage of object movement information could compensate lacks of spatial information in mean-shift algorithm.
However, their approach lacks of a mechanism for determining the proper transmit power.
Finally, our study lacks of a control group without pulmonary bacterial challenge.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Always use "lack of" instead of "lacks of" to ensure grammatical accuracy. "Lack" functions as a noun, needing no 's' when used in this construction.
Common error
Avoid using "lacks of" because it's grammatically incorrect. Remember that "lack" in this context is a noun, so the correct form is "lack of".
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "lacks of" is grammatically incorrect and functions as a deficient prepositional phrase. It attempts to indicate a deficiency or absence but fails due to improper grammar, as identified by Ludwig.
Frequent in
Science
30%
News & Media
25%
Formal & Business
20%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
10%
Wiki
8%
Reference
7%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, while the phrase "lacks of" is frequently encountered, as demonstrated by Ludwig's examples, it is grammatically incorrect. The correct usage is "lack of", where "lack" functions as a noun. The phrase is used across various contexts, from scientific publications to news articles, but its incorrectness diminishes its effectiveness, particularly in formal settings. As Ludwig AI indicates, using the correct preposition and grammatical structure is crucial for clear and effective communication. It's advisable to replace "lacks of" with grammatically sound alternatives like "lack of", "is lacking in", or "deficient in" to maintain credibility and clarity.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
lack of
Corrects the grammatical error by using the correct preposition "of" with "lack".
is lacking in
Rephrases to use the verb "to lack" in a continuous form with the correct preposition.
deficient in
Replaces the phrase with an adjective indicating a shortage or absence.
devoid of
Emphasizes a complete absence of something.
without
Uses a simple preposition to indicate the absence of something.
absence of
Focuses on the state of being absent.
shortage of
Highlights that there is not enough of something.
insufficiency of
Indicates an inadequate amount or quality.
scarcity of
Points out that something is rare or not easily found.
paucity of
Highlights a small or insufficient quantity.
FAQs
Why is "lacks of" considered grammatically incorrect?
The phrase "lacks of" is incorrect because "lack" functions as a noun in this context, and the correct form is "lack of". Using "lacks" incorrectly conjugates the noun as a verb.
What is the correct way to use "lack" in a sentence?
Use "lack of" followed by the thing that is missing. For example, "There is a "lack of evidence" to support the claim".
What can I say instead of "lacks of" to indicate a deficiency?
You can use alternatives like "lack of", "is lacking in", or "deficient in" to convey the same meaning with correct grammar.
Is "lacks" ever correct, or should I always use "lack of"?
"Lacks" is the third-person singular present tense form of the verb "to lack". It's correct when used as a verb, such as in the sentence "The plan lacks detail". The phrase "lack of" is used when "lack" functions as a noun.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested