Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
lacking in supporting evidence
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "lacking in supporting evidence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing claims, arguments, or statements that do not have sufficient evidence to back them up. Example: "The author's conclusions are lacking in supporting evidence, making it difficult to accept their findings as valid."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Academia
Alternative expressions(2)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
Our findings are in keeping with those of Dennis et al. However, we chose not to address organisation of health care in primary care, which they considered important though lacking in supporting evidence.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
59 human-written examples
Unfortunately all associated gene predictions were of rather low quality and either incomplete or including apparently un-detected introns (or highly divergent insertions) and lacking in supporting EST evidence.
Science
Yet even he betrays signs of the besetting weakness of NHS policy planners: an optimistic faith in the one-club solution, regardless of the lack of supporting evidence from anywhere else in the world.
News & Media
Gene structure prediction for members of the U group is the lowest in quality, due to lack of supporting evidence apart from similarity to CTLD sequence profiles and GenScan predictions.
Science
However, this study focused on quantifying the costs of procedures used in routine practice, despite the lack of supporting evidence at the time of use.
These putative ORFs were not included in iJN746 due to the lack of supporting evidence for their metabolic function, but this analysis showed that i) PAO1 has an isozyme present in its genome, and ii) KT2440 is very likely to have at least one other ORF encoding this or a similar function.
Science
However, evidence was lacking in support of a direct role for Btn1p in the regulation of V-ATPase.
They burgeoned in the next 20 years and influenced the views and practice of professionals, despite lack of supporting evidence.
In most cases, the issues are outstanding not because there is information that contradicts Iraq's account, but simply because there is a lack of supporting evidence.
News & Media
Like alligators living in the sewer, many urban myths assume a life of their own despite a total lack of supporting evidence.
News & Media
Supporting evidence trickled in from the brazen visibility of her face and hair, from her lack of a Koran, prayer mat or big black beard…".
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "lacking in supporting evidence", ensure you clearly articulate what specific claim or statement lacks the necessary evidence. This provides context and strengthens your critique.
Common error
Avoid using "lacking in supporting evidence" when there is some evidence, even if weak. Instead, consider phrasing it as "having limited supporting evidence" to maintain accuracy.
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "lacking in supporting evidence" functions as a descriptive qualifier. It's used to characterize a claim, argument, or theory as being inadequately supported by empirical data, logical reasoning, or other forms of validation. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is a usable expression in written English.
Frequent in
Science
50%
News & Media
25%
Academia
25%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "lacking in supporting evidence" is a grammatically correct and professionally appropriate way to express that a claim or statement doesn't have sufficient evidence to be considered valid. Ludwig AI confirms its usability. The phrase is most commonly found in scientific, news, and academic contexts, where critical evaluation is essential. When using this phrase, it is best practice to clearly specify what is "lacking in supporting evidence" to provide context and enhance the strength of your critique. Alternatives include "devoid of evidence" and "without substantiating proof".
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
devoid of evidence
Emphasizes a complete absence of evidence, slightly stronger than the original phrase.
without substantiating proof
Highlights the absence of proof that confirms or supports a claim.
unsubstantiated by data
Focuses specifically on the lack of data to back up a statement.
deficient in corroboration
Uses more formal language to indicate a lack of confirmation or validation.
bereft of validation
Similar to "devoid", but emphasizes the absence of validation or confirmation.
wanting in empirical basis
Highlights the lack of a solid, observable, or experimental foundation.
not backed by factual information
Directly points out the absence of factual backing.
unsupported by verifiable facts
Stresses the lack of facts that can be checked or proven true.
groundless in reality
Suggests the claim is not based on real-world evidence or observations.
without factual underpinning
Highlights the absence of a foundational factual basis.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "lacking in supporting evidence" in a sentence?
You can use alternatives like "devoid of evidence", "unsubstantiated by data", or "without substantiating proof" to convey a similar meaning.
What does it mean when something is described as "lacking in supporting evidence"?
It means that a claim, statement, or argument does not have enough facts, data, or other forms of proof to be considered valid or reliable.
Is it appropriate to use "lacking in supporting evidence" in formal writing?
Yes, "lacking in supporting evidence" is appropriate for formal writing. It's a clear and professional way to express that a claim is not adequately backed up by evidence.
What's the difference between "lacking in supporting evidence" and "absence of evidence"?
"Lacking in supporting evidence" suggests that there might be some evidence, but it's insufficient. "Absence of evidence" implies that there is no evidence at all. The former is a weaker claim than the latter.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested