lack of large

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "lack of large" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to describe an absence of something significant or substantial, but it is unclear without additional context. Example: "The lack of large resources has hindered the project's progress."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

51 human-written examples

Those predictions are largely based on a lack of large real estate transactions and a decline in Wall Street profits.

The New York Times

But swimming clubs and lane swimmers do regularly complain about the lack of large pools.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

The Swiss economy is characterized by industrial diversity and a lack of large firms.

Britannica

Tenants were looking downtown because of the lack of large blocks of space in midtown.

The New York Times

It wasn't just that there was a lack of large cash gifts from Trump himself — there weren't any.

The New Yorker

"Given our desire to diversify and the lack of large suitably zoned land, we jumped on it," Mr. Mumford said.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

9 human-written examples

However, machine learning research in this area has been dramatically limited by the lack of large-scale resources.

Stanford University

There is a lack of large-scale, robustly designed, randomized, controlled trials of intradialytic exercise training.

American Journal of Kidney Diseases

However, there is a lack of large-scale measurements of physical activity patterns across free-living populations worldwide1,6.

Nature

The decision-making process in the multidisciplinary management is handicapped by the lack of large-scale population-based prognostic studies.

The Spine Journal

To date, there has been a lack of large-n studies that provide a broad picture of these pledges.

Global Environmental Change

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing a deficiency, consider using more precise language like "limited", "scarce", or "insufficient" combined with specific nouns (e.g., "limited funding", "scarce resources", "insufficient data") to improve clarity and impact.

Common error

Avoid using "lack of large" as a generic descriptor. Instead, be specific about what is lacking: is it large quantities, significant impact, or substantial resources? This specificity will make your writing more informative and persuasive.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "lack of large" functions as a noun phrase, often acting as the subject or object of a sentence. It describes the absence or deficiency of something substantial. As noted by Ludwig AI, the phrase is not considered grammatically ideal and requires careful context to be understood. The examples on Ludwig illustrate its use across various fields.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

44%

News & Media

33%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "lack of large" appears in various contexts, particularly in scientific and news-related articles, it's grammatically questionable. Ludwig AI points out that it's not considered ideal and often necessitates clearer, more specific wording. It generally aims to highlight a deficiency in size, scale, or quantity. More precise alternatives, such as "scarcity of substantial", "deficiency of significant", or more specific descriptions like "limited funding" or "insufficient data", can enhance clarity and impact. As such, while understandable, careful consideration should be given to using more precise language.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

scarcity of substantial

Replaces "lack" with "scarcity" and "large" with "substantial", both implying a limited amount, but "scarcity" emphasizes rarity and "substantial" emphasizes considerable size.

deficiency of significant

Substitutes "lack" with "deficiency", highlighting a deficit, and "large" with "significant", indicating importance or consequence, not just size.

paucity of sizable

Uses "paucity" instead of "lack" to denote a small quantity, and "sizable" for "large", indicating considerable dimensions or extent.

shortage of considerable

Employs "shortage" for "lack", stressing an insufficient supply, and "considerable" for "large", denoting noteworthy magnitude or importance.

absence of extensive

Replaces "lack" with "absence" to focus on non-existence, and "large" with "extensive" implying broad coverage or scope.

limited availability of sizable

Replaces "lack" with "limited availability", directly addressing the restricted supply, while retaining "sizable" for emphasis on dimensions.

insufficiency of substantial

Uses "insufficiency" to indicate inadequacy, and "substantial" maintains the emphasis on a considerable amount or size.

inadequate quantity of significant

Emphasizes that the "quantity" is not "adequate", and replacing "large" with "significant", shifts the focus to importance rather than pure size.

restricted amount of considerable

Highlights that the "amount" is "restricted", while using "considerable" to emphasize that the size or quantity should be noteworthy.

dearth of noteworthy

Substitutes "lack" with "dearth", conveying a severe scarcity or absence, and "large" with "noteworthy" focusing on deserving attention due to size or impact.

FAQs

What does "lack of large" mean in a sentence?

The phrase "lack of large" generally points to a deficiency in size, scale, or quantity. It suggests that something is missing when a significant or substantial amount is expected. It often requires more specific wording to be grammatically correct and clear.

What can I say instead of "lack of large"?

You can use alternatives like "scarcity of substantial", "deficiency of significant", or "paucity of sizable" depending on the context. Consider what aspect you want to emphasize: size, quantity, or importance.

Is it grammatically correct to say "lack of large"?

While understandable, "lack of large" is not considered grammatically ideal. It's better to rephrase to be more precise, such as "lack of substantial resources" or "deficiency in significant data". The original phrase is awkward and often signals a need for clearer wording.

How does the meaning of "lack of large" differ from "absence of extensive"?

"Lack of large" generally refers to a missing significant amount, while "absence of extensive" suggests a complete non-existence of something broad or widespread. The latter emphasizes a more complete void than the former.