Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Despite the simplicity of this model and lack of fitted parameters, it broadly captures codon usage trends across multiple branches of life and for a wide range of GC bias.
Similar(58)
The lack-of-fit was not significant (p > 0.05).
Meanwhile the lack-of-fit the P values of 0.0027 indicated that the lack of fit was significant.
The lack-of-fit F-value of 0.7274 and 0.88 of ellagic acid and myricetin contents respectively reflects that the lack-of-fit was not significant.
The "lack-of-fit F-value" of 2.54 implied that the lack-of-fit was not significant relative to the pure error.
The kinetic models in this study were tested using a statistical lack-of-fit test.
The data fitting revealed R2 > 0.929, and no lack-of-fit could be verified (P > 0.05).
The lack-of-fit term of 0.9589 was not significant relative to the pure error.
The GCV criterion is estimated as the lack-of-fit criterion (Hastie and Tibshirani 2001).
Although the model exhibits highly significant factor effects, Lack-of-fit is also highly significant.
F-values for lack-of-fit were 3.43 and 3.88 for rutin and quercetin, respectively.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com