lack of are

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "lack of are" is not correct in English and does not convey a clear meaning.
It seems to be an incorrect construction and should be revised for clarity and grammatical accuracy. Example: "The lack of resources is affecting our project."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

A child's life achievements or lack of are not statements about our parental competency.

Huffington Post

This fact that is not at all lost on the artists, as privilege, opulence, and access (or lack of) are all elements that in addition to describing Mexican politics and late capitalism can also apply to the mainstream art world and its institutions.

Vice

- Health Professional ID02 Cues to action (or lack of) are also important modifying factors in the Health Belief Model for health seeking and providing behaviors for MSM in Malawi.

BMC International Health and Human Rights

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

53 human-written examples

Maybe that's my lack of being sufficiently circumspect.

The New York Times - Magazine

Career progression (or lack of) is also a problem.

The Guardian - Money

His lack of being in the scene.

Huffington Post

It is a fissure, a crack, a lack of being.

Vice

A lack of leadership is.

The New Yorker

Lack of interest is another.

The New York Times

Lack of investment is not the problem.

The New York Times

Your lack of remorse is chilling.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "lack of are" in your writing. It is grammatically incorrect. Instead, use phrases like "absence of", "shortage of", or "deficiency in" to express a lack.

Common error

The phrase "lack of are" incorrectly uses the plural verb "are" after "lack of". Ensure subject-verb agreement by using "lack of is" or, better yet, restructure the sentence for clarity and correctness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "lack of are" is grammatically incorrect and does not function properly in standard English. It attempts to express a deficiency but fails due to improper verb conjugation. As Ludwig AI notes, the phrase should be revised for clarity and grammatical accuracy.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

67%

Science

33%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "lack of are" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in both formal and informal writing. Ludwig AI identifies the phrase as an incorrect construction requiring revision for clarity and grammatical accuracy. While the intended meaning is to express a deficiency or absence, it fails to do so effectively. More appropriate alternatives include phrases like "absence of", "shortage of", or "deficiency in". It's crucial to ensure proper subject-verb agreement and sentence structure when expressing the concept of lacking something.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

absence of

Replaces "lack of are" with a grammatically sound phrase indicating a missing element.

deficiency in

Indicates a shortage or inadequacy, offering a more formal and grammatically correct alternative.

shortage of

Implies an insufficient amount, providing a clear and correct substitute.

paucity of

Conveys a scarcity or smallness of quantity, suitable for more formal contexts.

want of

An older, somewhat formal way to express a lack or absence.

scarcity of

Similar to 'shortage', emphasizing limited availability.

insufficiency of

Highlights the inadequacy of something, a more emphatic way to express a lack.

dearth of

Indicates a severe lack or scarcity, often used in literary contexts.

absence of existence

Emphasizes that something does not exist, more verbose than "absence of".

nonexistence of

Highlights the complete absence of something.

FAQs

What's wrong with the phrase "lack of are"?

The phrase "lack of are" is grammatically incorrect. It should be replaced with a grammatically correct alternative like "absence of" or "shortage of".

How can I correctly use the concept of 'lack of' in a sentence?

Use "lack of" followed by a noun and the singular verb "is" (e.g., "The lack of funding is a problem.") or rephrase using alternatives like "absence of" or "shortage of".

What are some alternatives to "lack of are" that maintain a similar meaning?

Better alternatives include "absence of", "deficiency in", or "shortage of", depending on the intended context.

Is "lack of are" ever considered acceptable in certain dialects or contexts?

No, "lack of are" is generally not considered acceptable in standard English dialects. It's advisable to avoid this phrase in formal or informal writing.