Your English writing platform
Discover Ludwig'lack for' is not a correct phrase in written English.
If you mean to say that someone is missing something and it cannot be replaced, you could use the phrase 'do without.' For example, "She had to do without a few basic necessities due to a lack of funds."
Exact(60)
He does not exactly lack for work.
Goldman did not lack for defenders.
But they hardly lack for laurels.
Scene will not lack for spice.
He does not lack for ideas.
O'Toole does not lack for confidence.
They do not, however, lack for confidence.
Hawaii doesn't lack for ineffective plans.
I never lack for players".
Ken didn't lack for boldness.
He doesn't lack for spirit.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com