Sentence examples for labels exhibited a from inspiring English sources

Compared with the commercially available {dAb FCA}, the {dAb AuNR FCA} labels exhibited a better performance for E. coli assay due to the advantages of AuNR@SiO2 as carriers.

In contrast, the model solely based on exon labels exhibited a lower correlation (r = 0.4) and higher RMSE (~0.14).

Neither the dox treatment nor labeling exhibited a global effect on protein abundance.

The protein-based mEos2 label exhibited a median photon yield of 990 (Supplementary Figure S6c), providing an image with lower median localization precision (11 nm, Supplementary Figure S6d).

In comparison with conventional label methods, i.e. spherical gold nanoparticles-labeled HRP-anti-AFP and HRP-labeled anti-AFP, the electrochemical immunosensor using HRP-anti-AFP-ISNGs as trace labels exhibited high bioelectrocatalytic response toward enzyme substrate and a wide dynamic range from 0.02 to 4.0 ng/mL with a low detection limit of 10 pg/mL toward AFP (at 3σ).

Moreover, the model invariance provides empirical support for the critical roles that PEOU and PU of sustainability labels exhibited in shaping positive Att and greater PI of a sustainability labelled apparel product, whether they are active sustainability label users or not.

Compared with the commonly used label set, {B, I, O}, this label set exhibited a more fine-grained distinction for the name components.

By imaging embryos at higher magnification and at more frequent time intervals, we found that labeled cells exhibited a delay in the initiation of migration toward the animal pole in aplnra/b morphants.

At 2 W power and 60 s ultrasound exposure in presence of 410 μg/ml SPIOs, H-22 cell labeling efficiency reached 69.4±6.3% and the labeled cells exhibited an iron content of 10.38±2.43 pg per cell.

Nanoparticles with one additional, labelled shell exhibited an intermediate fluorescence, and nanoparticles with two labelled shells showed the strongest fluorescence (Fig. 3).

Label-free PtNPs exhibited a maximum of emission at λ em = 400 nm and a maximum of excitation at λ exc = 290 nm (Additional file 1: Figure S1).