As these examples show, properly using racial, ethnic and religious labels is much harder than it looks.
As a result, retention of residualizing labels is much higher than retention of non-residualizing ones in liver and, especially, in kidneys (Hofström et al. 2011; Tolmachev et al. 2009).
In the early 90's, major labels were much more willing to take risks on unknown or "underground" acts.
The Bush-era 'Global War on Terror' label was much maligned, so Obama, in a document entitled A New Era of Fiscal Responsibility, actually did the opposite and made the budget for these overseas conflicts less transparent.
I think of accountants as "information engineers". I think this label is much more descriptive of what accountants do inside of organizations, specifically creating and communicating information that facilitates and influences decisions made across of the organization.
He said that pressures from fans and the record label were much larger; also noting that he "thrives on the pressure, because it gets [him] going".
Moreover, at that time the Ki67 labeling was much lower, indicating a drop in cell proliferation in the clusters.
LGR7 labeling was much higher in the pregnant kidneys, suggesting a potential role of relaxin in the control of tubular transport during pregnancy.
BrdU labeling was much more prominent in cells that retained p56Lck than in cells in the same mice (or in control mice) that had lost it (Figure S1B).
However, the LPC 16:0 methyl-D9-labelling was much lower (~50%) compared to other LPC species.
