Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
However, regulatory agencies and pharmaceutical manufacturing specifications require that actual drug concentrations be within a narrow range approximating the labelled strength.
Similar(58)
In the dunnart retina, PNA labeled all cones, but labeling strength along the membrane varied such that at times the PNA label was reduced to a spotted pattern (see vertical section in Figure 4B).
Create a chart like this one, with four boxes, labeled "Strengths," "Weaknesses," "Opportunities" and "Threats," on the board.
We labelled the strength of the association: correlation coefficients r = 0.00-0.19 weregardedded as very weak, r = 0.20-0.39 as weak, r = 0.40-0.59 as moderate, r = 0.60-0.79 astrongng and r = 0.80-1.00 as very strong [ 26].
The csGM-LDA model combines the labeling strength of topic supervision with the flexibility of topic discovery, and the modeling problem can be effectively solved by a variational expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm.
Recently, Markova et al. [29] used GISH with genomic DNA probes from diploid species of Silene onto metaphases of related diploids to show that labeling strength was inversely correlated to genetic distance, i.e. there was strongest labeling to the most closely related species.
Besides, F labels the strength of the dc electric field, while e is the absolute value of the electron charge.
We labeled the strength of the ES 0.20 as small, 0.50 as medium and 0.80 as large [ 11].
The pooled ES z) were converted back to a correlation coefficient [ 12]: r = tanh(ES z )) in which we labeled the strength of the association; absolute values of r, 0.00 0.19 is regarded as very weak, 0.20 0.39 as weak, 0.40 0.59 as moderate, 0.60 0.79 as strong and 0.80 1.00 as very strong correlation [ 13].
Look for a formula labeled "clinical strength.
In a study three years ago, Mr. Gurley found that half the brand-name ephedra products differed from label strengths by at least 20percentt.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com