Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
4 (3.8%) patients labelled as negative by the emergency physicianwere detected to have free fluid during the radiologist's scan.
Cloforex is labelled as negative in the dataset [23] but Ryrfeldt [24] suggested that it should be labelled as positive, and procaine is a CAD which does not induce phospholipidosis, perhaps due to its low logP.
This suggests a weak-positive sample tested on a platform like the HerdChek™ may stand a better chance of remaining distinguishable from the mean negative-sample result, despite potentially being labelled as "negative" by the X-Chek™ software.
In the current study as well, the first factors can be labelled as "negative perception" and the second factor as "positive perception".
Similar(56)
It was the first time I'd ever seen what I'd considered a list of positive words labeled as "negative".
We also expect there to be a large number of proteins in the training set that due to the lack of experimental data are wrongly labelled as negatives.
False negative (FN) refers to the number of positive tuples that were incorrectly labeled as negative.
There is a small chance that, for a small number of molecules, this assumption is not valid, and they are therefore incorrectly labeled as negative examples.
Vectors generated from reviews that have at least 4-star ratings are labeled as positive, while vectors labeled as negative are generated from 1-star and 2-star reviews.
Secondly, because of the particular way we calculate the final pocket score (see Equation 7), even the predictions labeled as negative (having P 1 probability lower than 0.5) contribute to the score to some extent.
After completion of the training process and the determination of the upper and lower boundaries, new samples falling between the two boundaries are labeled as positive (i.e., members of the set) and other samples are labeled as negative (i.e., non-members of the set).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com