Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(15)
Labeling something "classified" or important to "national security" does not make it so.
We live in an era in which labeling something "fake" is becoming synonymous with political inconvenience.
Because the animal was exotic and unseen by Americans, Morris notes, "labeling something kangaroo back then was roughly equivalent to calling it abnormal or bizarre today".
The current CNN logo is "America's New War," but labeling something "new" doesn't do much to define it -- it merely pretends to see what's on the other side of the post-terror fault line.
While not a large amount, it speaks to the challenge of labeling something that it is not.
Labeling something as best practices is not a substitute for wisdom, discernment, discretion, subject matter expertise, intellect, creativity or any of the other qualities I value in an advisor.
Similar(45)
One country may label something obscene while another protects it under freedom of speech.
Darfur proves that the US government's willingness to label something 'genocide' is not enough.
As soon as we label something, our curiosity about that thing diminishes.
As attacks against Muslims have risen, many have been labeled something other than terrorism.
So I'm never quite sure what people mean when they label something an "issue book".
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com