Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
A unique label was defined for each region in the first fluorescence channel (e.g. Nc82).
The range for each label was defined as: If 1 ≤ m < 1.5 → FORTA Class A If 1.5 ≤ m < 2.5 → FORTA Class B If 2.5 ≤ m < 3.5 → FORTA Class C If m ≥ 3.5 → FORTA Class AD where m = arithmetic mean based on the raters' grades 1 4.
Awareness of a label was defined as the proportion of participants who freely recalled the warning label, plus the proportion who of participants who did not freely recall the label, but recognised it after being presented with an image of the label.
The range for each label was defined as: if 1 ≤ m < 1.5 → FORTA Class A if 1.5 ≤ m < 2.5 → FORTA Class B if 2.5 ≤ m < 3.5 → FORTA Class C if m ≥ 3.5 → FORTA Class AD if 1 ≤ m < 1.5 → FORTA Class A if 1.5 ≤ m < 2.5 → FORTA Class B if 2.5 ≤ m < 3.5 → FORTA Class C if m ≥ 3.5 → FORTA Class AD where m = mean based on the raters' Grades 1 4.
Similar(56)
A "label" is defined as "a display of written, printed, or graphic matter upon the immediate container of any article". 21 U.S.C. § 321(k).
SLGA is based on the mutation and crossover operators of genetic algorithms, which are applied on a subdivided search space where an integer label is defined on a polytope built on the n – dimensional space.
Then, the temporal coherence for each label is defined as (11).
The four individual criteria making up the composite label are defined in the methods section: total number of surgeries, frequency of surgery, distal involvement, tracheostomy status.
Recall that a label is defined by the SD via a follow-up VL measure.
The cells retaining label were defined as those which had EdU signal that completely colocalized with signal from DAPI staining of nuclear DNA.
Transcripts without sense, antisense or long non-coding label were defined as 'unknown' (5) and may include misassembled transcripts, but also (anti sense transcripts or lncRNA with insufficient alignment length or identity to known sequences.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com