Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Parameters of oncomiR level: β I : time point I, β II : the difference between time points I and II, β III : the difference between time points I and III, β C : the difference between time point I and healthy control, and β L : the difference between high risk and low risk EBC patients.
Similar(59)
When SSD ≤ L the differences between the available horizontal SSD (for R = Rmin) vs. the design (demanded) SSD values and between Rmin (equilibrium concept) vs. the desirable horizontal radius (based on SSD design values) are significant.
Its elements are given by, where ∆P (l) is the difference between the powers of two MF models at degree l.
From spectral graph theory, we can now define the unnormalized graph Laplacian matrix L as the difference between the degree matrix and the weighted adjacency matrix (L = D−W).
The difference (mean ± standard deviation) between approximated IDVG calculated from plasma samples and original IDVG was -0.05 ± 0.54 l, and the difference between approximated IDVG calculated from whole blood samples and original IDVG was -0.04 ± 0.61 l.
L is the difference between the residuals and its average.
Finally, β L represents the difference between data from high-risk and low-risk EBC patients.
It was calculated in the following way: Deformation = (Δ L/ L0) × 100 where, Δ L = L – L0 is the difference between diameters of stretched (L) and relaxed (L0) cell.
Given movement of an arm from section i to j (or k to l ), the larger the difference between the numbers, d= | i − j | or | k − l|, the more geometrically dissimilar positions i and j or k and l are.
If the R-IFG also involved in only familiarity same as L-IFG, the difference between conditions would not show to be statistically significant.
Although the L-PeriInfarct had a similar response to the L-Lesion mask (0.19 ± 0.18), due to a large standard deviation of the L-Lesion responses, the difference between the L-Lesion and L-Healthy was not significant (P = 0.093).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com