Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Since the facts in Lemma 2.1 are well known, we omit the detailed proof here, see Stein [27], for instance.
Similar(59)
"We know we have omitted something, but we cannot include it because we simply do not know what it is.
For this reason, we omit from consideration species known to be commensals with human.
For simplicity of the argument, we assume that parameters are known, and omit showing these values.
Rayner (2012, p. 108) states that: "in drawing attention to what we know we know, what we know we don't know and what we don't know we don't know, Rumsfeld altogether omitted what is possibly the most intriguing combination: what we don't know we know".
If we omit this, we omit our history".
We omit the technical details.
Therefore, we omit it.
So, we omit them.
Hence we omit it.
We omit additional details.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com