Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
In a U.S. survey of 1,000 females, only 11% were aware of the fact that STIs are more harmful to females than to males; those with less knowledge were less likely to practise safer sex[ 39].
A somewhat complementary finding related to female-initiation and disclosure was that women who felt that it was "very important" to be able to use the products without the partner's knowledge were less likely to consistently use them (AOR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.60 0.89).
One systematic review found that physicians with more experiential knowledge were less likely to adhere to appropriate standards of care, a finding which they describe as inconsistent with the notion that experience enhances knowledge and skills, leading to better patient care.
Similar(57)
So those who join schools having less knowledge are less likely to develop".
On the other hand, reviewers with relevant industry knowledge are less likely to give such favourable reviews.
First, spouses whose occupational information reveals dissimilarity in terms of knowledge are less likely to divorce or separate.
Spouses with relatively distant (non-redundant) knowledge are less likely to divorce, even if both of them work instead of fully availing themselves of specialization.
A systematic review which evaluated the relationship between clinical experience and performance suggested that physicians who have been in practice for a longer period and those who are older possess less factual knowledge, are less likely to adhere to appropriate standards of care, and may also have poorer patient outcomes.
Compared to male migrant workers, females had lower HIV knowledge and were less likely to have multiple sexual partners.
Women and candidates with higher scores on their applied knowledge test were less likely to fail the clinical skills assessment at the first attempt.
Married participants and those with high diabetes-related knowledge score were less likely to be non-adherent ([O.R = 0.6; 95% C.I of 0.4 – 0.9] and [O.R = 0.8; 95% C.I of 0.7 - 0.9] respectively).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com