Sentence examples for knowledge problematic from inspiring English sources

Level 3 in which scientists were seen as concerned with building ever more powerful and explanatorily adequate theories about the world: knowledge problematic.

The range of choices, the complexities with obtaining and setting up materials, and the wide variety of sources of error are what makes scientific knowledge problematic - it is complex work and involves planning and thinking that can frequently be inaccurate or misdirected, yet another important aspect of the scientific struggle that makes science knowledge problematic and difficult to attain.

Planning and carrying out investigations employing the 5D unpacked practices are important experiences that help students engage with conceptual knowledge, procedural knowledge, and epistemic knowledge and encounter struggle experiences that can help develop a knowledge problematic view of scientific inquiry.

Our hypothesis is that the component elements deciding, developing, documenting, devising, and determining in the 5D provides struggle type experiences for students that will lead (1) to acquiring conceptual, procedural, and epistemic knowledge and (2) to attaining desired knowledge problematic images of the nature of science.

Students view scientific knowledge as problematic.

Once again, we see how obtaining, building, and refining scientific knowledge becomes problematic.

If so, then the standard translation of the graph zhi as "knowledge" becomes problematic, identified as it is with "justified true belief".

The problems of the mechanics of omniscience aside, the traditional theist might argue that the process view of God's knowledge is problematic because it either limits God's knowledge or it violates elementary principles of logic.

Our results indicate that a chief architect or central developer acts as a 'walking architecture' devising changes and discussing local designs while at the same time updating his own knowledge about problematic aspects that need to be addressed.

This is not because the scientists, the aims of the projects or the knowledge generated are problematic or useless.

The proof of knowledge approach is problematic.